Evaluate Microsoft Partner Before Signing SOW (2026)
Six-step evaluation, paid pilot approach, SOW red flags, reference-call questions.
Founded 1997 · in our 30th year11,000+ enterprise engagementsMicrosoft Press bestselling author
Six-step evaluation, paid pilot approach, SOW red flags, reference-call questions.
Last updated by Errin O'Connor, Founder & Chief AI Architect, EPC Group
Six-step Microsoft partner evaluation: (1) Verify Solutions Partner designations, (2) interview named senior architect, (3) call 3 references at your scale/industry, (4) review + call case-study customers, (5) compare fixed-fee vs T&M proposals for same scope, (6) run 2-week paid pilot before full commitment. Ten essential SOW elements + six red-flag phrases. Seven top reference-call questions. EPC Group offers paid pilots refundable against larger SOW.
Six-step evaluation: (1) Verify Microsoft Solutions Partner designations on partner.microsoft.com (should show specific designations, not just "certified partner"). (2) Interview the named senior architect (do a technical deep-dive on your specific problem, not just credentials). (3) Call 3 references at your scale + industry (ask about turnover, scope creep, post-implementation support). (4) Review 2-3 detailed case studies + call the customer names on the case studies. (5) Compare fixed-fee vs T&M proposals for identical scope (delta reveals scope confidence). (6) Run a paid 2-week pilot before committing to full engagement — 90% of partners fail this test.
A paid pilot is a small, contained engagement (typically 2-4 weeks, scoped after discovery) that reproduces the delivery model on a low-risk scope. Examples: Discovery workshop that produces a real architecture document, proof-of-concept deployment of one Copilot use case, permission audit of one SharePoint site collection. Pilot value: (1) You see the actual delivery team (not the sales team). (2) You experience the working style, communication cadence, and technical depth firsthand. (3) You get a concrete deliverable to critique. (4) You test the escalation process by injecting a small artificial issue. Pilot cost is refundable via SOW credit if you sign a larger engagement.
Ten essential SOW elements: (1) Named senior architect (title + tenure + hours committed). (2) Fixed-fee OR T&M with weekly ceiling (never open-ended T&M). (3) Defined deliverables with acceptance criteria. (4) Milestone schedule with dependencies clearly stated. (5) Change control process (how scope changes get approved + priced). (6) Warranty period (30-90 days post-delivery). (7) Data privacy + confidentiality terms. (8) IP ownership (client owns code + config; consultant owns methodology). (9) Escalation matrix (who to call, what timeline). (10) Post-implementation support model (transition to managed services OR handoff).
Six red-flag phrases: (1) "Best efforts" (no accountability). (2) "T&M with no cap" (unbounded cost). (3) "Consultants at partner discretion" (bait-and-switch). (4) "Subcontractors may be engaged" (offshore hand-off risk). (5) "Deliverables to be defined during engagement" (scope creep). (6) "Client responsible for all data prep" (dumping ground for surprises). Any 2+ red flags = negotiate them out or walk away.
Two-week paid pilot lets you test escalation: (1) Inject a small artificial issue on Day 5 (e.g., "we need to change one requirement"). (2) Watch how fast the firm responds, who handles it, and how transparent the communication is. (3) Real firms have a named escalation matrix (Delivery Lead → Practice Director → Managing Partner). (4) Junk firms escalate to whoever answers the phone. (5) Timeline to first substantive response: healthy firms < 2 hours, warning signs 4-8 hours, red flag 24+ hours.
Seven questions to ask references: (1) Would you hire them again? (Anything less than yes = red flag.) (2) What surprised you positively or negatively? (Uncovers off-brochure info.) (3) Did the senior architect who won the deal stay on the delivery? (Bait-and-switch test.) (4) How did they handle scope changes? (Fixed-fee integrity test.) (5) What is their post-implementation support like? (Long-term relationship test.) (6) How does their pricing compare to what you thought going in? (Scope creep test.) (7) Would you introduce me to other clients they served? (Endorsement depth test.)
EPC Group evaluation-friendly practices: (1) Named senior architect on every SOW (their name + LinkedIn URL). (2) Fixed-fee accelerators for all scoped engagements (fixed-fee, scoped after discovery). (3) Case studies with named customer references (not anonymized). (4) 2-week paid pilots offered — refundable against larger SOW. (5) Public Microsoft Solutions Partner status showing all six core designations. (6) 5-10+ year consultant tenure norm. (7) Transparent escalation matrix (Delivery Lead → Practice Director → Errin O'Connor). Call (888) 381-9725 to run this evaluation.
EPC Group pilot engagements refundable against larger SOW. Call (888) 381-9725.
Monday-Friday, 8 AM - 7 PM CT
We respond to all inquiries within one business day
AI assistant — not human