Skip to main content
Microsoft Solutions Partner — Security · 11,000+ engagements

Microsoft Global Secure Access (ZTNA & SSE / SASE) Enterprise Guide (2026)

Entra Internet Access, Entra Private Access, and Microsoft Tunnel — the Microsoft Security Service Edge platform that retires legacy VPN and consolidates Zscaler, Netskope, and Prisma Access onto one Conditional Access policy plane. Delivered by a senior-architect-led Microsoft Solutions Partner founded in 1997.

What is Microsoft Global Secure Access and how does it replace legacy VPN with ZTNA? Microsoft Global Secure Access is the Microsoft Security Service Edge platform — Entra Internet Access as the identity-aware Secure Web Gateway, Entra Private Access as the Zero Trust Network Access layer replacing legacy VPN, and Microsoft Tunnel as the per-app mobile VPN for managed iOS and Android. The three components run under a single unified Conditional Access policy plane, consolidating Zscaler ZIA plus ZPA, Netskope Intelligent SSE, Palo Alto Prisma Access, and Cisco AnyConnect-plus-Umbrella onto one Microsoft stack. EPC Group delivers the full migration under a fixed-fee five-phase Accelerator between $300K and $1M over 12 to 24 weeks.

Microsoft Global Secure Access is the Microsoft SSE platform — Entra Internet Access SWG, Entra Private Access ZTNA, and Microsoft Tunnel mobile VPN, unified under one Conditional Access policy plane. It retires legacy VPN (Cisco AnyConnect, Palo Alto GlobalProtect, F5 BIG-IP APM, Pulse Secure), consolidates Zscaler ZIA-plus-ZPA-style SSE spend into the Entra Suite SKU, and integrates cleanly with incumbent SD-WAN for the SASE outcome. EPC Group delivers the full migration under a fixed-fee five-phase Accelerator between $300K and $1M.

Key Facts

  • Three pillars — Entra Internet Access (SWG), Entra Private Access (ZTNA replacing VPN), Microsoft Tunnel (mobile per-app VPN)
  • One unified Conditional Access policy plane spans SWG, ZTNA, mobile, identity, Microsoft 365, and Azure — single policy engine, single audit log
  • Microsoft Entra Suite SKU (~$12/user/month list) bundles Entra ID P2, Entra ID Governance, Entra Verified ID, Internet Access, and Private Access
  • Per-application Conditional Access for private apps — RDP, SSH, SMB, LDAP, Kerberos, web apps, and legacy TCP/UDP apps all supported
  • Connector-based outbound architecture — no inbound firewall ports required; legacy VPN concentrators decommissioned and attack surface shrunk
  • Microsoft 365 traffic optimization accelerates Exchange Online, SharePoint Online, Teams, and Copilot through the Microsoft edge plane
  • FedRAMP-authorized service; SASE through Global Secure Access SSE plus incumbent SD-WAN partner (Cisco, VMware, Versa, Aryaka, Aruba)
  • Microsoft Solutions Partner founded in 1997, 70+ Fortune 500 clients; EPC Group five-phase SASE Accelerator, a fixed fee scoped to the estate

The three Global Secure Access pillars — SWG, ZTNA, and mobile VPN

Microsoft Global Secure Access is the umbrella brand. The product surface decomposes into three component pillars, each replacing a category of legacy infrastructure and each evaluated against the same Conditional Access policy engine.

Microsoft Entra Internet Access — the Secure Web Gateway

The full outbound internet traffic plane for every user on a managed endpoint — every web request to a sanctioned SaaS application, every shadow IT lookup, every public internet destination. The traffic plane that has historically demanded a Zscaler ZIA or Netskope ZIA deployment to enforce.

  • Identity-aware Secure Web Gateway with universal Conditional Access enforcement on every web request
  • Microsoft 365 traffic optimization — direct-routed acceleration for Exchange Online, SharePoint Online, Teams, and Copilot endpoints
  • Web content filtering across forty-plus content categories with per-user, per-group, and per-Conditional-Access policy enforcement
  • Threat intelligence integration with Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence and the Microsoft security graph for malicious URL and IP blocking
  • Token theft protection — Conditional Access compliant-network-location signal enforced at the SWG layer, raising the bar against AiTM phishing

Entra Internet Access is the Microsoft answer to Zscaler ZIA, Netskope Next Gen SWG, Palo Alto Prisma Access Cloud SWG, and Cisco Umbrella. It is the SWG component of the Microsoft Security Service Edge.

Microsoft Entra Private Access — the ZTNA layer replacing legacy VPN

Every private application historically published through a legacy VPN concentrator, a Citrix Gateway, a F5 BIG-IP APM, a Palo Alto GlobalProtect, a Cisco AnyConnect, or an Azure Application Proxy. Internal web apps, RDP and SSH targets, legacy thick-client TCP and UDP apps, on-premises file shares — the full private-application catalog that has run over a VPN for two decades.

  • Zero Trust Network Access for any TCP or UDP private application, replacing the all-or-nothing tunnel of a legacy VPN with per-application identity-aware access
  • Connector-based architecture — lightweight Windows connectors deployed inside the private network publish applications outbound, no inbound firewall ports required
  • Per-application Conditional Access policy — device compliance, MFA strength, identity risk, sign-in risk, named location, and named device enforced at the application level
  • Quick Access groups for rapid VPN-replacement scenarios where dozens of apps need to be published as a single network segment before app-by-app refinement
  • Native support for protocols that legacy ZTNA platforms struggle with — RDP, SSH, SMB, LDAP, Kerberos, and on-premises Active Directory authentication for hybrid identity scenarios

Entra Private Access is the Microsoft answer to Zscaler ZPA, Netskope Private Access, Palo Alto Prisma Access Private App Connector, Cloudflare Access, Cato Networks ZTNA, and Cisco Secure Access. It is the ZTNA component of the Microsoft Security Service Edge.

Microsoft Tunnel — mobile per-app VPN for managed iOS and Android

Mobile device traffic from corporate-managed iOS and Android endpoints — Microsoft Intune-enrolled phones and tablets accessing private applications and sanctioned SaaS, where Entra Private Access mobile clients are not yet the preferred path or where strict mobile-only VPN policy is required.

  • Per-app VPN scoping so only managed corporate apps tunnel through Microsoft Tunnel, leaving personal app traffic untouched on BYOD-style mobile fleets
  • Conditional Access integration so Tunnel access is gated by device compliance, MFA, and Entra ID Protection risk signals
  • Microsoft Tunnel Gateway deployed as a Linux container on the customer network or in Azure, with auto-scaling and HA built into the architecture
  • Native Intune deployment of the Microsoft Defender for Endpoint mobile app, which carries the Tunnel client as one capability of the unified mobile security agent
  • Migration path to Entra Private Access mobile clients as the unified ZTNA experience for mobile matures across iOS and Android

Microsoft Tunnel is the bridge product covering managed mobile devices today while Entra Private Access mobile capability continues to expand. Many enterprises deploy Microsoft Tunnel for mobile alongside Entra Private Access for Windows and macOS, then converge as the mobile ZTNA experience reaches feature parity.

Six enterprise deployment patterns

The six recurring patterns EPC Group sees across Fortune 500 and regulated enterprise Global Secure Access deployments. Each pattern decomposes into a defined application catalog, a Conditional Access policy profile, and a measurable outcome.

Pattern 1 — Legacy VPN retirement program

The defining use case. A 2,000-to-50,000-user enterprise running Cisco AnyConnect, Palo Alto GlobalProtect, F5 BIG-IP APM, or Pulse Secure as the remote-access tunnel for 200-plus published applications wants to retire the appliance fleet, shrink the attack surface, and move to identity-aware per-application access. EPC Group deploys Entra Private Access as the ZTNA target, ships Quick Access groups for rapid mass-publishing of legacy apps as an initial network segment, then refines into per-application Conditional Access policy over a phased twelve-to-twenty-four-week program. The legacy VPN concentrators are decommissioned, the inbound firewall ports closed, and the enterprise moves from a flat-network VPN tunnel to per-application zero-trust access at scale.

Pattern 2 — BYOD and unmanaged-device ZTNA access

Contractor laptops, employee personal devices on BYOD programs, and acquired-company endpoints not yet domain-joined or Intune-enrolled all need access to a defined catalog of internal applications. Entra Private Access publishes the application catalog with Conditional Access policy requiring app-protection policies, browser-based access through Entra Application Proxy or Edge-enforced policy, or Defender for Cloud Apps session controls layered for sensitive workloads. The pattern eliminates the historic compromise of either issuing corporate laptops to every contractor or accepting unmanaged-device tunnels into the corporate network.

Pattern 3 — Microsoft 365 and Salesforce sanctioned-SaaS protection

The SWG side of the SSE story. Entra Internet Access acts as the identity-aware Secure Web Gateway for traffic to Microsoft 365, Salesforce, Workday, ServiceNow, GitHub Enterprise Cloud, and the rest of the sanctioned SaaS catalog. Conditional Access compliant-network-location signal raises the bar against token theft and adversary-in-the-middle phishing. Microsoft 365 traffic optimization routes Exchange, SharePoint, Teams, and Copilot traffic over the fast path while non-sanctioned SaaS continues through full SWG inspection. Salesforce-specific Conditional Access policy plus Defender for Cloud Apps session controls block unauthorized data exfiltration from the CRM tier.

Pattern 4 — Tier 0 admin access plus Privileged Access Management

Domain controllers, Azure subscription management, M365 tenant admin, Active Directory Tier 0 administration — the highest-privilege access plane. Entra Private Access publishes the admin jump-host fleet behind per-application Conditional Access policy requiring Privileged Access Workstation device compliance, FIDO2 authentication strength, no-personal-device sign-in, and Entra Privileged Identity Management eligible-role activation. The pattern aligns with Microsoft enterprise admin tiering model and integrates with Azure Bastion for inside-Azure RDP and SSH targets so the admin path is identity-aware end-to-end. See our /azure-bastion-privileged-access-just-in-time-2026 hub for the Bastion side of the Tier 0 pattern.

Pattern 5 — Third-party contractor and vendor access

External contractors, managed-service-provider technicians, software vendor support staff, and acquired-entity workforce needing time-bounded access to a defined application catalog. Entra Private Access publishes the contractor application set scoped by Entra B2B guest identity, with Conditional Access policy enforcing time-bounded eligibility through Entra Identity Governance access packages and access reviews. The pattern replaces the historic anti-pattern of issuing internal Active Directory accounts to contractors plus the VPN tunnel — moving instead to guest identity plus per-application ZTNA scoped to the engagement contract.

Pattern 6 — Multi-cloud secure access across Azure, AWS, and GCP

Enterprises running material workloads across Azure, AWS, and GCP need consistent identity-aware access policy regardless of which cloud the application runs in. Entra Private Access connectors deploy inside each cloud VNet or VPC, publishing applications across all three clouds under the same Conditional Access policy plane. The result is a single ZTNA fabric covering on-premises private apps, Azure-resident apps, AWS-resident apps, and GCP-resident apps — independent of the per-cloud native access tools. The pattern is particularly valuable post-M&A where acquired entities arrive with their own cloud footprint and need to be folded into the parent identity-aware access policy.

Microsoft Security Service Edge architecture and the SASE outcome

Global Secure Access is the SSE half of a Secure Access Service Edge framework. The SD-WAN half ships through partnership with the incumbent SD-WAN ecosystem. The architectural difference that matters most is the unified Conditional Access policy plane that spans every component.

A globally distributed Microsoft edge plane

Microsoft Global Secure Access traffic terminates at Microsoft edge locations co-located with the global Microsoft 365 service edge. Users connect from anywhere — corporate office, home, hotel, airport — and traffic egresses to the Microsoft edge before being delivered to its destination. The architecture is the Microsoft Security Service Edge platform, the SSE component of a Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) framework.

Identity is the new perimeter — Conditional Access is the policy plane

Every web request and every private-application connection is evaluated against the same Conditional Access policy engine that already governs Microsoft 365, Azure, and the Entra ID identity fabric. There is no separate policy plane for the SWG, no separate policy plane for the ZTNA. Device compliance, MFA strength, identity risk, sign-in risk, named locations, named devices, Entra ID Protection risk score, and session controls all evaluate inside one engine. This is the architectural difference against Zscaler and Netskope, which run separate policy planes that customers reconcile with Conditional Access through custom integration.

SSE plus SD-WAN equals SASE — Microsoft partners with the SD-WAN ecosystem

Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) is the convergence of Security Service Edge (SSE) plus Software-Defined Wide Area Network (SD-WAN). Microsoft Global Secure Access is the SSE half. The SD-WAN half is delivered through Microsoft partnership with Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN, VMware VeloCloud, Versa Networks, Aryaka, Aruba EdgeConnect, and the broader SD-WAN ecosystem — each of which integrates with Global Secure Access through standardized branch and remote site connectors. For enterprises wanting a single-vendor SASE, Cato Networks or Palo Alto Prisma Access remain the alternative architecture; for enterprises wanting best-of-breed SSE plus existing SD-WAN, Global Secure Access plus the incumbent SD-WAN partner is the canonical Microsoft pattern.

A single unified Conditional Access policy for SWG plus ZTNA

The most under-appreciated capability of Microsoft Global Secure Access is policy unification. The same Conditional Access policy that gates a user from signing into Exchange Online or SharePoint Online also gates that user from reaching the SWG egress, the ZTNA private application, and the Microsoft Tunnel mobile session. One policy engine. One enforcement model. One audit log. The simplification against running Zscaler ZIA plus Zscaler ZPA plus Microsoft Conditional Access in parallel is material, and the operational savings are visible in SOC investigation time and in change-management overhead within the first 90 days.

Licensing — Entra Suite versus standalone SKUs

Microsoft offers three commercial paths to Global Secure Access. For most enterprises deploying both Internet Access and Private Access, the Microsoft Entra Suite SKU is the economical and operational floor.

Microsoft Entra Internet Access

The Secure Web Gateway component — outbound internet traffic, Microsoft 365 traffic acceleration, web content filtering, threat intelligence enforcement.

Pricing: Available as a standalone Entra Internet Access SKU or as part of the Microsoft Entra Suite bundle. List pricing approximately $8 per user per month standalone; materially lower when consumed inside the Entra Suite bundle.

Microsoft Entra Private Access

The Zero Trust Network Access component — per-application access to private apps, VPN replacement, multi-cloud private-app publishing.

Pricing: Available as a standalone Entra Private Access SKU or as part of the Microsoft Entra Suite bundle. List pricing approximately $8 per user per month standalone; materially lower when consumed inside the Entra Suite bundle.

Microsoft Entra Suite

The recommended bundle for any enterprise deploying both Entra Internet Access and Entra Private Access. Entra Suite combines Entra ID P2, Entra ID Governance, Entra Verified ID, Entra Internet Access, and Entra Private Access into a single per-user SKU.

Pricing: Approximately $12 per user per month list at the Suite price — materially less than buying the components individually. For most enterprises deploying Global Secure Access, Entra Suite is the economical and operational floor.

Microsoft Tunnel

Included with Microsoft Intune licensing — the per-app mobile VPN for managed iOS and Android. No separate SKU.

Pricing: Entitled through Microsoft Intune Plan 1 or above. No incremental per-user cost beyond the existing Intune licensing footprint, which most Microsoft 365 E3 and E5 customers already carry.

Cost and capability versus Zscaler, Netskope, Palo Alto Prisma Access, Cisco, and Cloudflare

The five pure-play SSE and SASE platforms EPC Group most often replaces or integrates with during Global Secure Access engagements. Each has defensible strengths in specific enterprise contexts.

Zscaler Internet Access plus Zscaler Private Access

The market leader on pure-play SSE. Strongest in net-new SSE deployments at enterprises with no Microsoft footprint, in OT and IoT segmented-network deployments, and in customer environments where the security team owns the SSE platform independently of identity. Weaker on Microsoft 365 traffic optimization economics, on Conditional Access policy unification, and on per-user list price for Microsoft 365 E5 customers who can fold SSE into the Entra Suite SKU. EPC Group migrates Zscaler ZIA plus ZPA into Global Secure Access for Microsoft-anchored enterprises seeking license consolidation and policy unification — the recurring annual savings typically exceed the migration engagement fee in the first year.

Netskope Intelligent SSE

Strongest in Cloud Access Security Broker depth, with the most mature inline CASB inspection across sanctioned and unsanctioned SaaS. Strong in regulated industries with deep DLP requirements at the SWG layer. Weaker on Conditional Access integration, on Microsoft 365 traffic optimization, and on the unified policy engine that Global Secure Access delivers. EPC Group typically replaces Netskope SWG with Entra Internet Access plus Defender for Cloud Apps inline CASB for Microsoft-anchored enterprises, preserving Netskope only where best-of-breed CASB depth is non-negotiable.

Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access

The pure-play SASE leader combining Prisma Access SWG, Prisma Access Private App Connector ZTNA, and Prisma SD-WAN into a single vendor stack. Strongest in single-vendor SASE consolidation when the customer is already a Palo Alto firewall standardized shop. Weaker on Microsoft 365 traffic acceleration, on Conditional Access unification, and on per-user economics for Microsoft 365 E5 customers. EPC Group migrates Prisma Access ZTNA into Entra Private Access for Microsoft-anchored enterprises while preserving Prisma SD-WAN as the WAN fabric — the SSE-plus-existing-SD-WAN pattern is the canonical Microsoft SASE answer.

Cisco Umbrella plus Cisco Secure Access plus Cisco SD-WAN

The Cisco SASE stack — Umbrella as the DNS-layer security and SWG, Secure Access as the ZTNA component, Catalyst SD-WAN as the WAN fabric. Strongest in Cisco-anchored networking estates with existing AnyConnect VPN, Catalyst SD-WAN, and Meraki branch footprint. Weaker on Conditional Access policy unification with Entra ID and on the Microsoft 365 traffic optimization plane. EPC Group migrates Cisco AnyConnect into Entra Private Access for Microsoft-anchored enterprises while preserving Catalyst SD-WAN as the branch WAN fabric — Global Secure Access integrates cleanly into the Catalyst SD-WAN ecosystem through the Microsoft SD-WAN partner program.

Cloudflare Access plus Cloudflare Gateway

The fastest-rising SSE platform, particularly strong in developer-anchored enterprises and in deployments where the customer already runs Cloudflare as the CDN and WAF. Weaker on Conditional Access integration depth, on Microsoft 365 traffic optimization, and on the regulatory framework portfolio Microsoft brings (FedRAMP-authorized for the Global Secure Access service). EPC Group respects Cloudflare for customers whose security team standardizes on Cloudflare as the platform — Global Secure Access is the recommendation for Microsoft-anchored enterprises.

EPC Group SASE Migration Accelerator — five phases, fixed fee, $300K to $1M

The fixed-fee delivery program for Global Secure Access — from incumbent SSE and VPN vendor assessment through legacy VPN decommission, SWG activation, and managed steady state. Twelve to twenty-four weeks for a 5,000-to-25,000-user enterprise.

Phase 1 — Assess

VPN-to-ZTNA migration assessment in three to four weeks

Phase one is a fixed-fee assessment that inventories the existing remote-access estate — VPN concentrator vendor, user counts, published application catalog, average concurrent session counts, peak bandwidth, regional egress topology, and current Conditional Access posture. EPC Group produces a costed migration roadmap, a risk-weighted application backlog scored by complexity, a license consolidation analysis comparing Entra Suite economics against incumbent SSE spend, and a board-ready decision package.

  • Full inventory of legacy VPN, SWG, ZTNA, and SD-WAN incumbent vendors with renewal calendar and per-user cost baseline
  • Application catalog inventory categorized by web app, RDP, SSH, SMB, legacy TCP/UDP, and mobile-required scope
  • Conditional Access posture baseline and gap analysis against the unified-policy-engine target state
  • Costed Entra Suite versus standalone Entra Internet Access plus Private Access licensing model with three-year TCO projection
Phase 2 — Pilot

Entra Private Access pilot for a defined application set

Phase two activates Entra Private Access for a controlled pilot cohort — typically the IT department plus two business units totaling 200 to 500 users — covering a defined catalog of 10 to 25 private applications. EPC Group ships the connector fleet, establishes the Quick Access groups, configures the per-application Conditional Access policy, and validates the user experience across Windows, macOS, iOS, and Android endpoints before broader rollout.

  • Entra Private Access connector fleet deployed across the customer private network with HA and capacity sizing
  • Application catalog published — web apps through native publishing, RDP and SSH through TCP/UDP publishing, on-premises AD apps through native Kerberos support
  • Pilot Conditional Access policy enforcing device compliance, MFA strength, and Entra ID Protection risk gating
  • User experience validation across the four endpoint platforms with measured connection latency and application response time
Phase 3 — Rollout and VPN decommission

Wave-based user migration and legacy VPN retirement

Phase three is the production rollout. EPC Group sequences wave-based user migration from the legacy VPN onto Entra Private Access, typically in 1,000-to-5,000-user waves on a two-to-four-week cadence depending on enterprise change-management tolerance. Each wave brings additional applications onto the ZTNA platform under per-application Conditional Access policy, with the legacy VPN running in parallel as a fallback during the cutover window. After all users and applications migrate, the legacy VPN concentrators decommission and inbound firewall ports close.

  • Wave-based user migration plan with named cutover dates, communications, and rollback procedure
  • Application-by-application refinement from Quick Access groups into per-application Conditional Access policy
  • Legacy VPN concentrator decommission with inbound firewall port closure and external attack-surface reduction
  • Microsoft Tunnel rollout for managed iOS and Android mobile fleet through Intune deployment of Defender for Endpoint mobile
Phase 4 — SWG activation and Internet Access

Entra Internet Access SWG activation for outbound web traffic

Phase four activates Entra Internet Access as the Secure Web Gateway for outbound web traffic. EPC Group sequences the activation by user cohort, validates Microsoft 365 traffic optimization is delivering the expected acceleration for Exchange Online, SharePoint Online, Teams, and Copilot, configures the web content filtering policy aligned to the customer acceptable-use policy, and integrates threat intelligence enforcement with Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence and the broader security graph.

  • Entra Internet Access SWG activated by user cohort with measured Microsoft 365 traffic acceleration validation
  • Web content filtering policy aligned to the customer acceptable-use policy and reviewed by HR plus legal
  • Threat intelligence enforcement integrated with Defender Threat Intelligence and Conditional Access compliant-network-location signal
  • Sanctioned-SaaS access patterns refined for Salesforce, Workday, ServiceNow, GitHub Enterprise Cloud, and the customer SaaS catalog
Phase 5 — Operate

24/7 managed Global Secure Access with senior-architect escalation

Phase five is steady-state operation. EPC Group provides managed Global Secure Access services — 24-by-seven monitoring of the connector fleet, the SWG enforcement plane, the ZTNA application catalog, and the Conditional Access policy lifecycle. Senior-architect escalation is the differentiator; tier-one analysts handle the routine, but every customer has named senior architects on call for the policy decisions, exception adjudications, and architecture questions that matter.

  • 24/7 SOC monitoring of Global Secure Access connector health and SWG plus ZTNA enforcement plane
  • Quarterly Conditional Access policy review with customer security architecture and identity governance leads
  • Application onboarding pipeline for new private apps brought into the ZTNA catalog post-go-live
  • License optimization review covering Entra Suite consumption against deployed-feature usage and three-year TCO trajectory

Why EPC Group for Microsoft Global Secure Access

Nearly three decades of Microsoft consulting leadership. A 70+ Fortune 500 client base. 11,000+ engagements. A founder who is a four-time Microsoft Press & Sams author. The credential stack that earns the Tier 0 admin access decisions and the SOC investigation lineage decisions that come with a Global Secure Access deployment.

70+ Fortune 500 clients

Identity-aware access, Conditional Access governance, and Microsoft security platform engineering at the largest end of the enterprise market.

216+ M&A tenant migrations

1.83 million users migrated. M&A is where Global Secure Access wins the multi-cloud, multi-incumbent SSE consolidation play.

Microsoft Solutions Partner — Security

FedRAMP-aligned, HIPAA HITRUST, FFIEC, CMMC Level 2, PCI-DSS 4.0, SOC 2 — the regulatory framework portfolio Global Secure Access deployments demand.

Related EPC Group enterprise hubs

Global Secure Access is one pillar of the broader Microsoft Zero Trust platform. The companion EPC Group hubs cover the surrounding identity, endpoint, cloud workload, and AI security planes a complete Zero Trust architecture requires.

Frequently asked questions

What is Microsoft Global Secure Access and how does it replace a legacy VPN?

Microsoft Global Secure Access is the Microsoft Security Service Edge (SSE) platform — the SWG plus ZTNA plus mobile per-app VPN unified into one product surface under one Conditional Access policy plane. It is the brand name covering three component capabilities: Microsoft Entra Internet Access (the SWG for outbound web traffic), Microsoft Entra Private Access (the ZTNA layer for private applications, replacing legacy VPN), and Microsoft Tunnel (per-app VPN for managed iOS and Android). Enterprises retire legacy VPN concentrators (Cisco AnyConnect, Palo Alto GlobalProtect, F5 BIG-IP APM, Pulse Secure) by publishing private applications through Entra Private Access connectors, applying per-application Conditional Access policy, and migrating users in waves before decommissioning the legacy VPN. EPC Group delivers the migration under a fixed-fee five-phase accelerator over 12 to 24 weeks.

How does Global Secure Access compare to Zscaler ZIA and Zscaler ZPA?

Zscaler is the market leader on pure-play SSE — strongest in net-new deployments at enterprises with no Microsoft footprint, in OT and IoT segmented-network deployments, and in environments where the security team owns the SSE platform independently of identity. Global Secure Access wins on Microsoft 365 traffic optimization economics, on the unified Conditional Access policy engine spanning identity plus SWG plus ZTNA plus Microsoft 365 plus Azure, and on per-user list price for Microsoft 365 E5 customers who fold SSE into the Entra Suite SKU. For Microsoft-anchored enterprises, EPC Group routinely migrates Zscaler ZIA plus ZPA onto Global Secure Access — the annual license savings typically exceed the migration engagement fee inside the first year, and the policy-engine unification delivers ongoing operational savings in SOC investigation time and in change-management overhead. For pure non-Microsoft estates, Zscaler remains the defensible choice.

How does Global Secure Access compare to Netskope Intelligent SSE?

Netskope is strongest in Cloud Access Security Broker depth — the most mature inline CASB inspection across sanctioned and unsanctioned SaaS, with deep DLP enforcement at the SWG layer. Global Secure Access wins on Conditional Access integration, on Microsoft 365 traffic optimization, and on the unified policy engine. For Microsoft-anchored enterprises, EPC Group typically replaces Netskope SWG with Entra Internet Access plus Defender for Cloud Apps inline CASB — preserving Netskope only where best-of-breed CASB depth is non-negotiable and the customer is willing to absorb the operational overhead of running two policy engines in parallel. The decision framework comes back to whether identity-centric unification or CASB-depth specialization is the higher-leverage priority for the security operations center.

How does Global Secure Access compare to Palo Alto Prisma Access?

Palo Alto Prisma Access is the pure-play SASE leader — Prisma Access SWG plus Prisma Access Private App Connector ZTNA plus Prisma SD-WAN combined into a single-vendor stack. Strongest in single-vendor SASE consolidation when the customer is already a Palo Alto firewall standardized shop. Global Secure Access wins on Microsoft 365 traffic acceleration, on Conditional Access unification, and on per-user economics for Microsoft 365 E5 customers. The Microsoft canonical SASE answer pairs Global Secure Access as the SSE half with the incumbent SD-WAN partner (Cisco Catalyst, VMware VeloCloud, Versa, Aryaka, Aruba EdgeConnect, or the customer existing SD-WAN choice) — preserving the SD-WAN investment while consolidating the security plane onto Microsoft. For Palo Alto firewall standardized shops with mature Prisma SD-WAN, the migration path is to retain Prisma SD-WAN and migrate Prisma Access SSE into Global Secure Access.

How does Global Secure Access compare to Cisco Umbrella plus Cisco Secure Access plus Cisco SD-WAN?

The Cisco SASE stack — Umbrella as DNS-layer security and SWG, Secure Access as ZTNA, Catalyst SD-WAN as WAN fabric — is strongest in Cisco-anchored networking estates with existing AnyConnect VPN, Catalyst SD-WAN, and Meraki branch footprint. Global Secure Access wins on Conditional Access policy unification with Entra ID and on Microsoft 365 traffic optimization. The recurring EPC Group pattern is to migrate Cisco AnyConnect VPN into Entra Private Access (eliminating the VPN concentrator fleet) while preserving Catalyst SD-WAN as the branch WAN fabric — Global Secure Access integrates cleanly with Catalyst SD-WAN through the Microsoft SD-WAN partner program. The result is Microsoft SSE plus Cisco SD-WAN, the canonical mixed-vendor SASE answer for Cisco-networking-plus-Microsoft-identity enterprises.

What does Microsoft Global Secure Access actually cost per user?

List pricing approximately $8 per user per month for Entra Internet Access standalone, approximately $8 per user per month for Entra Private Access standalone, and approximately $12 per user per month for the Microsoft Entra Suite bundle (which includes Entra ID P2, Entra ID Governance, Entra Verified ID, Entra Internet Access, and Entra Private Access in one SKU). Microsoft Tunnel for mobile is entitled through Microsoft Intune Plan 1 or above with no incremental per-user cost. For most Microsoft 365 E3 or E5 enterprises deploying both Internet Access and Private Access, the Entra Suite SKU is the economical and operational floor — materially less than buying the components individually and bundling Entra ID P2 plus Entra ID Governance plus Verified ID at no incremental cost. A 10,000-user enterprise running Entra Suite is roughly $1.4 million per year in Microsoft consumption, materially below comparable Zscaler ZIA-plus-ZPA-plus-Conditional-Access licensing.

How complex is the deployment, and how long does it actually take?

A realistic Global Secure Access deployment for a 5,000-to-25,000-user enterprise runs 12 to 24 weeks under the EPC Group five-phase accelerator. Phase 1 Assess is three to four weeks. Phase 2 Pilot is four to six weeks for a 200-to-500-user controlled pilot covering 10 to 25 applications. Phase 3 Rollout is six to twelve weeks for wave-based user migration and legacy VPN decommission. Phase 4 SWG Activation is two to four weeks. Phase 5 Operate is steady-state managed service. Fixed-fee engagement pricing typically lands in the $300,000 to $1,000,000 range depending on user count, application catalog complexity, and the number of incumbent vendors being displaced. The fixed-fee structure eliminates the open-ended time-and-materials risk that legacy VPN-to-ZTNA programs have historically carried.

Does Microsoft Global Secure Access support FedRAMP, CMMC, and other regulated workloads?

Microsoft Global Secure Access is FedRAMP-authorized for the commercial cloud, with capabilities aligned to the standard EPC Group regulatory framework portfolio — HIPAA HITRUST for healthcare, FFIEC and SOX for financial services, CMMC Level 2 for defense contractors, PCI-DSS 4.0 for retail, and SOC 2 for the broader SaaS estate. EPC Group is a FedRAMP-aligned Microsoft Solutions Partner with nearly three decades of consulting leadership across regulated industries. For US Government workloads requiring GCC High or DoD cloud, the Global Secure Access service follows the Microsoft sovereign cloud roadmap; EPC Group sequences deployments by tenant boundary to match the customer regulatory scope. See our /standards-alignment hub for the full mapping of Microsoft security platform capabilities against the regulatory framework portfolio.

Retire legacy VPN. Consolidate SSE spend. Unify the policy plane.

EPC Group delivers the Microsoft Global Secure Access migration under a fixed-fee five-phase Accelerator — Assess, Pilot, Rollout and VPN Decommission, SWG Activation, Operate. $300,000 to $1,000,000 fixed-fee for a 5,000-to-25,000-user enterprise. Twelve to twenty-four weeks. Senior-architect-led, regulatory-framework aligned, license-savings positive inside the first year.

AI assistant — not human