
Enterprise video conferencing and collaboration comparison for meetings, calling, and unified communications
After deploying collaboration platforms for 300+ enterprise organizations, EPC Group provides an unbiased comparison of Microsoft Teams and Zoom. The 2020 pandemic made Zoom a household name for video meetings, but Microsoft Teams has evolved into a comprehensive collaboration platform that now dominates enterprise deployments. Here is what the data shows for 2026.
Monthly active Teams users vs ~300M Zoom meeting participants
TCO savings with Teams for Microsoft 365 customers
Zoom-to-Teams migrations completed by EPC Group
Comparing Microsoft Teams (M365 E5) against Zoom Workplace Enterprise across video conferencing and collaboration capabilities.
| Capability | Microsoft Teams | Zoom |
|---|---|---|
| HD Video Meetings (1,000+ capacity) | ||
| Persistent Chat & Channels | ||
| Cloud PBX / Phone System | ||
| AI Meeting Summaries | ||
| Native File Collaboration (SharePoint) | ||
| Desktop Office Apps Integration | ||
| Real-Time Translation (40+ languages) | ||
| Together Mode / Immersive View | ||
| Power Platform Integration | ||
| Information Barriers & DLP | ||
| FedRAMP High Authorization | ||
| 49-Person Gallery View | ||
| Virtual Backgrounds (AI-enhanced) | ||
| Breakout Rooms | ||
| Webinar Platform (10,000+) | ||
| AI Companion (Free with Plan) |
3-year TCO analysis for a 1,000-user enterprise deployment with video meetings, chat, and phone calling.
Meetings + Chat + Productivity
Teams included (calling extra)
3-Year TCO (1,000 users):
$1.6M - $1.9M
Includes full productivity suite
Full UCaaS + Security + Analytics
Everything included
3-Year TCO (1,000 users):
$2.1M - $2.4M
Full platform: UCaaS + productivity + security
+ M365 for Productivity
+ Zoom Phone + M365 license
3-Year TCO (1,000 users):
$2.8M - $3.5M
Zoom + M365 dual licensing
Most organizations running Zoom still require Microsoft 365 for email (Exchange), file storage (SharePoint/OneDrive), and desktop Office apps. This means paying for both Zoom and M365 -- resulting in 30-50% higher costs compared to consolidating on Teams. The only scenario where Zoom is more cost-effective is when an organization has zero Microsoft 365 dependency, which is rare in enterprise environments where 82% of Fortune 500 companies use M365.
Our proven approach for consolidating from Zoom to Microsoft Teams with zero-downtime telephony transitions.
Zoom usage audit, license inventory, phone number mapping, and room system catalog
Teams governance, channel structure, phone architecture, and meeting policies
50-user pilot with IT team testing meetings, calling, and integrations
Phased rollout by department with parallel access and user training
Zoom Phone number porting, SBC config, and calling plan activation
Adoption monitoring, call quality analytics, and Zoom license decommission
Microsoft Teams is typically better for enterprises already using Microsoft 365, as it provides unified chat, meetings, calling, and file collaboration in a single platform included in their existing license. Zoom is better for organizations that prioritize best-in-class video conferencing and need a platform-agnostic solution. For total cost of ownership, Teams wins for M365 customers (40-65% savings) while Zoom may be more cost-effective for organizations without Microsoft 365 licenses.
Zoom rebranded to "Zoom Workplace" in 2024, expanding beyond video meetings into chat (Team Chat), email (Zoom Mail), calendar, whiteboard, and document editing (Zoom Docs). While Zoom Workplace aims to match Teams as a collaboration platform, Microsoft Teams still has deeper productivity integration (SharePoint, OneDrive, Office apps, Power Platform), broader compliance capabilities, and a larger app ecosystem (1,800+ integrations vs 2,500+ for Zoom but with less enterprise depth).
Both platforms deliver excellent video quality in 2026. Zoom historically had an edge in video optimization and gallery view, but Teams has closed this gap with AV1 codec support, intelligent bandwidth management, and new features like IntelliFrame for room cameras. Zoom still offers slightly more polished virtual backgrounds and better gallery view for large meetings (49 participants per screen vs 49 in Teams). For most enterprise use cases, video quality is functionally equivalent.
Teams is included in all Microsoft 365 plans starting at $12.50/user/month (Business Basic). For E3 customers ($36/user/month), Teams with meetings, chat, and basic calling is included at no additional cost. Zoom Workplace Business costs $13.33/user/month for meetings only. Zoom Workplace Enterprise costs $21.99/user/month. When adding Zoom Phone ($13-26/user/month), the total Zoom cost for meetings + calling + a separate M365 license often exceeds $60/user/month -- more than Microsoft 365 E5 ($57/user/month) which includes everything.
Teams Phone (included in E5 or $8/user/month add-on) provides cloud PBX with auto attendants, call queues, voicemail transcription, and Direct Routing for PSTN connectivity through 200+ certified SBCs. Zoom Phone ($13-26/user/month) offers similar cloud PBX features with native PSTN in 45+ countries. Teams Phone has a larger certified device ecosystem and deeper Microsoft 365 integration. Zoom Phone is often faster to deploy for organizations not using Microsoft 365. Both support call recording, analytics, and mobile apps.
Microsoft Teams inherits the full Microsoft 365 security stack: Entra ID Conditional Access, Microsoft Purview DLP, information barriers, insider risk management, and 90+ compliance certifications (FedRAMP High, HIPAA, CJIS, ITAR, DoD IL5). Zoom provides AES-256 GCM encryption, optional end-to-end encryption, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, FedRAMP Moderate (not High), and HIPAA BAA. For highly regulated industries, Teams has significantly broader compliance coverage. Zoom has improved substantially but still trails in government and healthcare certifications.
Yes. A typical Zoom to Teams migration for 1,000 users takes 4-8 weeks. Key steps include: (1) assess current Zoom usage patterns and integrations, (2) configure Teams policies and channels, (3) migrate Zoom Phone numbers to Teams Phone via Direct Routing or number porting, (4) run parallel deployment for 2-4 weeks, (5) decommission Zoom. The biggest challenges are migrating Zoom Phone DIDs, retraining users on the Teams interface, and converting Zoom Room hardware to Teams Rooms. EPC Group has completed 200+ Zoom-to-Teams migrations.
Zoom AI Companion (included free with paid plans) provides meeting summaries, smart compose for chat, and whiteboard generation. Microsoft 365 Copilot ($30/user/month add-on) offers deeper integration across Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Outlook, and Teams with enterprise data context through Microsoft Graph. For meeting-specific AI, both are comparable. For cross-application AI productivity (document drafting, data analysis, presentation creation), Copilot is significantly more capable. The trade-off is cost: Zoom AI Companion is included while Copilot is $30/user/month.
EPC Group has completed 200+ Zoom-to-Teams migrations for enterprise organizations. Get an expert assessment of your migration path, TCO savings, and deployment timeline. Most organizations achieve 40-65% cost savings by consolidating on Teams.
This comparison was authored by Errin O'Connor, Founder & CEO of EPC Group, with 28+ years of enterprise collaboration and unified communications consulting. Errin has led 300+ Microsoft Teams deployments and 200+ platform migrations (Zoom, Webex, Skype for Business) for Fortune 500 organizations across healthcare, finance, government, and manufacturing. His Microsoft Press books on Teams, SharePoint, and enterprise collaboration are used as industry references by IT leaders worldwide.
Continue exploring collaboration insights and services