Microsoft Cloud for Healthcare — Industry Cloud Hub (2026)
Microsoft Cloud for Healthcare Enterprise Guide (2026)
How HIPAA-covered healthcare enterprises deploy Microsoft Cloud for Healthcare end-to-end — Azure Health Data Services (FHIR + DICOM + MedTech), Microsoft Fabric Healthcare data solutions, Dynamics 365 Patient Engagement, Microsoft Teams Healthcare, and Power Platform templates — with audit-ready governance, consent honored at every touch, and active healthcare Business Associate Agreements anchoring the practice.
Published 2026-06-16 · Microsoft Solutions Partner — six designations · 4× Microsoft Press bestselling author · Active healthcare BAAs
Microsoft Cloud for Healthcare bundles Azure Health Data Services (FHIR + DICOM + MedTech), Microsoft Fabric Healthcare data solutions, Dynamics 365 Patient Engagement, Microsoft Teams Healthcare, and Power Platform healthcare templates under one HIPAA-eligible industry cloud. EPC Group delivers a fixed-fee, milestone-priced five-phase Healthcare Cloud Accelerator from $300K to $1.2M under active healthcare Business Associate Agreements.
Key Facts
- EPC Group is a Microsoft Solutions Partner with six designations and 29 years of Microsoft consulting delivery since 1997.
- 11,000+ Microsoft engagements completed across 70+ Fortune 500 organizations.
- Microsoft Cloud for Healthcare bundles Azure Health Data Services (FHIR + DICOM + MedTech), Microsoft Fabric Healthcare data solutions, Dynamics 365 Patient Engagement, Microsoft Teams Healthcare, and Power Platform healthcare templates.
- Active Business Associate Agreements with Palmetto Infusion, ARRT, OMRF, Eisenhower Health, and Medavie anchor the HIPAA-covered-entity practice.
- 500+ Microsoft Fabric implementations and 1,500+ Power BI deployments — both extend naturally into the Fabric Healthcare lakehouse and the Power BI healthcare semantic models.
- Six named enterprise use cases — payer 360, clinical analytics, virtual care, care coordination, claims AI, and population health — each with named Microsoft Cloud for Healthcare surfaces.
- Compliance coverage spans HIPAA, SOC 2, FedRAMP, FINRA, CMMC, GxP — with HIPAA, 42 CFR Part 2, FDA Software as a Medical Device, and state privacy law (CMIA, HB 300, SHIELD Act, My Health My Data Act) mapped to the Purview taxonomy at engagement kick-off.
- EPC Healthcare Cloud Accelerator is a five-phase fixed-fee engagement priced $300K to $1.2M depending on number of components in scope and regulatory overlay.
The Five Microsoft Cloud for Healthcare Components
Microsoft Cloud for Healthcare is not a single product. It is an industry-specific bundling of five named components, each with a distinct purpose in the HIPAA-covered enterprise stack. The deployment plan names which components are in scope, which are deferred, and which are out of scope before any provisioning happens. Every component is in scope under the Microsoft HIPAA Business Associate Agreement.
Azure Health Data Services — FHIR + DICOM + MedTech
Azure Health Data Services is the managed platform-as-a-service layer that brings the FHIR service, DICOM service, and MedTech IoT service into one HIPAA-eligible workspace. The FHIR service exposes a managed HL7 FHIR R4 endpoint with SMART on FHIR app launch, $export bulk operations, and Entra ID authorization. The DICOM service stores imaging studies natively against the DICOMweb specification with Purview image-level governance. The MedTech service ingests continuous device telemetry — patient monitors, infusion pumps, CGMs, RPM kits — and normalizes streams into FHIR Observation resources. The workspace is the unit of regulatory boundary and BAA scope.
Named capabilities
- Managed HL7 FHIR R4 endpoint with SMART on FHIR app launch, bulk $export, and Entra ID authorization
- DICOMweb-native imaging store with study, series, and instance level access control and Purview sensitivity-label propagation
- MedTech device ingestion pipeline that normalizes raw device streams into FHIR Observation resources with named mapping templates per device family
- Azure Private Link, customer-managed keys, and infrastructure encryption available end-to-end with HIPAA BAA scope at the workspace boundary
Microsoft Fabric Healthcare data solutions
Microsoft Fabric Healthcare data solutions extend Fabric OneLake with healthcare-aware accelerators — FHIR ingestion pipelines, a clinical and claims medallion architecture, OMOP Common Data Model conversion, de-identification routines, and prebuilt notebooks for population-health analytics. The accelerator drops a healthcare-specific bronze and silver schema into the lakehouse, conformed to FHIR resource types and to the OMOP CDM, with sensitivity labels applied at the OneLake storage layer by Microsoft Purview. Power BI semantic models anchor on the gold layer. Microsoft 365 Copilot grounds on a curated, de-identified gold-layer extract — never on raw clinical records — with the sensitivity-label policy enforced at every layer of the stack.
Named capabilities
- Healthcare medallion architecture — bronze, silver, gold — preconfigured with FHIR resource conformance and OMOP Common Data Model conversion
- Prebuilt accelerator notebooks for population-health, payer analytics, clinical quality measures, and social-determinants-of-health enrichment
- OneLake-native de-identification pipelines with documented re-identification risk and Purview sensitivity-label propagation to every downstream surface
- Native Power BI semantic models for HEDIS, CMS Star Ratings, CMS Promoting Interoperability, and 21st Century Cures Act information-blocking metrics
Dynamics 365 Patient Engagement + Healthcare CRM
Dynamics 365 Patient Engagement is the patient relationship-management layer in Microsoft Cloud for Healthcare. The component delivers a longitudinal patient record built on Dataverse, a care management workspace for care coordinators, a virtual-care visit surface, a patient outreach workflow tied to consent, and a patient-engagement Power Apps shell that surfaces FHIR resources from Azure Health Data Services. The Microsoft Cloud for Healthcare common data model harmonizes the patient timeline across the FHIR resources, the Dataverse CRM tables, and the Dynamics 365 marketing journeys, with consent and preferences enforced at every touch.
Named capabilities
- Longitudinal patient record on Dataverse with FHIR resource alignment and consent-aware data access
- Care management workspace for care coordinators with role-based view of allergies, problems, medications, encounters, and care plans
- Outreach and marketing journeys for screening reminders, post-discharge follow-up, and chronic-condition management — consent-gated
- Virtual-care visit scheduling, Teams meeting orchestration, and post-visit summary generation routed through the Dynamics 365 care timeline
Microsoft Teams Healthcare + virtual visits
Microsoft Teams Healthcare extends Teams with healthcare-specific surfaces — the Teams electronic-health-record connector for Epic Hyperdrive, Oracle Health Millennium, and MEDITECH Expanse; the Virtual Appointments app for scheduled and ad-hoc virtual visits; nurse-secure-messaging templates aligned to HIPAA; and the Teams Rooms hardware certified for clinical environments. The Teams EHR connector surfaces the right patient context inside a Teams channel without the clinician leaving Teams, and the Virtual Appointments app delivers a HIPAA-compatible video surface with waiting room, lobby management, and SMS notification to the patient mobile device.
Named capabilities
- Teams EHR connector for Epic Hyperdrive, Oracle Health Millennium, and MEDITECH Expanse — clinician sees the right patient context inside Teams without leaving the EHR security perimeter
- Virtual Appointments app with lobby, waiting room, SMS notification, and post-visit clinical summary handoff to the electronic health record
- Nurse-secure-messaging templates aligned to HIPAA with sensitivity-label enforcement at the chat layer
- Teams Rooms hardware certified for clinical environments — operating room consult, multidisciplinary tumor board, intensive-care-unit family conference
Power Platform healthcare templates
Microsoft Cloud for Healthcare ships a library of Power Platform templates that compress months of build work into starting points. Care-coordination Power Apps, patient-intake Power Pages, infection-surveillance Power Automate flows, screening-eligibility Copilot Studio agents, and revenue-cycle Power Apps run on the same Dataverse-and-FHIR backbone that anchors Dynamics 365 Patient Engagement. The templates are not the final solution — they are the prebuilt entity model, the prebuilt screens, and the prebuilt automation that let an EPC engagement reach a clinically usable state in weeks, not quarters.
Named capabilities
- Care-coordination, patient-intake, screening-eligibility, and revenue-cycle Power Apps templates anchored on Dataverse plus FHIR
- Power Automate flows for infection surveillance, no-show prediction, prior-authorization status, and post-discharge call campaigns
- Power Pages patient-facing portal templates with Entra External ID federation for consumer identity
- Copilot Studio healthcare agents for symptom triage, appointment booking, and benefit eligibility — grounded on consented patient context, never on raw clinical narrative
Six Enterprise Use Cases — Architecture Briefings
Six use cases account for the overwhelming majority of Microsoft Cloud for Healthcare enterprise deployments today. Every use case names the Microsoft surfaces in scope, the regulatory boundary, and the data flow end-to-end. No use case is invented at engagement kick-off — the architecture is anchored on the named pattern before the first ticket is opened.
Payer 360 — member, claims, provider, authorization
Health plans and integrated delivery networks running both delivery and risk need a member 360 that fuses enrollment, claims, authorizations, provider network status, and clinical quality measures into one consented view. The EPC pattern lands enrollment and claims into the Microsoft Fabric Healthcare lakehouse bronze layer, conforms to FHIR Coverage and Claim resources at the silver layer, and assembles the member 360 at the gold layer. Power BI delivers the member, provider, and population views. Dynamics 365 Patient Engagement holds the longitudinal CRM record. Copilot grounds on a de-identified outreach extract and surfaces personalized member messaging — never identified clinical narrative — through Power Automate journeys.
Microsoft surfaces in scope
- Fabric Healthcare bronze and silver — enrollment, claims, authorizations, provider network, clinical quality measures
- Fabric Healthcare gold — member 360 semantic model with Power BI row-level security tied to the member-services security matrix
- Dynamics 365 Patient Engagement — longitudinal CRM record, consent, outreach journey, and care-management workspace
- Copilot grounding on a de-identified outreach extract behind a Purview sensitivity label, with member-facing messaging delivered through Power Automate
Clinical analytics — quality, safety, and outcomes
Clinical analytics in 2026 is no longer a single Power BI report on length of stay. The use case spans Joint Commission core measures, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Promoting Interoperability metrics, hospital-acquired condition surveillance, sepsis early warning, mortality and morbidity review, and unplanned readmission attribution. The Microsoft Cloud for Healthcare lakehouse holds the conformed clinical layer. Power BI delivers the clinical-leadership and service-line dashboards. Microsoft Fabric notebooks run the predictive models for sepsis, readmission, and adverse-event detection. Microsoft Sentinel houses the audit trail. Copilot grounds on the gold-layer extract for clinical-leadership Q-and-A, never on raw narrative.
Microsoft surfaces in scope
- Microsoft Fabric Healthcare lakehouse — clinical quality measures, surveillance feeds, and conformed encounter data
- Power BI clinical-leadership dashboard set — Joint Commission, CMS Promoting Interoperability, hospital-acquired conditions, mortality and morbidity review
- Fabric notebooks running sepsis early warning, unplanned readmission, and adverse-event predictive models with documented model governance
- Microsoft 365 Copilot grounding on the gold-layer extract behind a Purview sensitivity label for clinical-leadership Q-and-A and pattern-finding
Virtual care — Teams Virtual Appointments + RPM
Virtual care in 2026 is more than a Teams meeting. The use case fuses scheduled and ad-hoc Teams Virtual Appointments, asynchronous secure messaging, and continuous remote-patient-monitoring telemetry from Azure Health Data Services MedTech. The patient books through a Power Pages portal, joins the visit through a Teams Virtual Appointment, has the clinical summary written back to the EHR through a Teams EHR connector or a FHIR Encounter resource, and continues post-visit through asynchronous Teams Healthcare nurse-secure-messaging. Continuous remote-monitoring data flows from MedTech into the Fabric Healthcare lakehouse for trend review and clinical escalation.
Microsoft surfaces in scope
- Power Pages patient portal with Entra External ID federation and consent-aware appointment booking
- Teams Virtual Appointments with lobby, waiting room, SMS notification, and post-visit clinical summary handoff to the EHR
- Azure Health Data Services MedTech continuous device ingestion into FHIR Observation resources for remote-patient-monitoring trend review
- Microsoft Sentinel audit-log retention of every virtual-visit invocation, every device-data ingest event, and every clinician access to remote-patient-monitoring trend dashboards
Care coordination — care plans, transitions, and risk stratification
Care coordination spans transitions between inpatient, post-acute, and ambulatory settings; risk stratification across chronic and rising-risk populations; and proactive outreach for screening, follow-up, and chronic-condition management. The Microsoft Cloud for Healthcare common data model harmonizes the patient timeline across FHIR resources and Dataverse. Dynamics 365 Patient Engagement is the care-coordinator workspace; Power Automate orchestrates outreach; Copilot Studio agents deliver consented screening-eligibility conversation. The stack honors patient consent at every touch.
Microsoft surfaces in scope
- Dynamics 365 Patient Engagement care-management workspace with longitudinal patient timeline and care-plan templates
- Power Automate outreach journeys for transitions of care, screening eligibility, post-discharge follow-up, and chronic-condition management — consent-gated
- Copilot Studio healthcare agents for screening-eligibility conversation, appointment booking, and benefit eligibility on the consented patient context
- Microsoft Fabric risk-stratification notebooks anchored on the gold-layer member or panel view
Claims AI — adjudication assistance and denial avoidance
Claims AI is the highest-revenue-impact AI use case in healthcare today, spanning payer-side adjudication assistance and provider-side denial avoidance with the Fabric Healthcare lakehouse as the data backbone. Fabric notebooks score every claim against the payer rule set, surface the high-denial-risk subset, and route the actionable subset to a Power Apps reviewer queue. Copilot grounded on the de-identified claim corpus accelerates triage. Purview labels, Sentinel logs, and documented model governance apply end-to-end.
Microsoft surfaces in scope
- Fabric Healthcare lakehouse — claims, remittance, eligibility, prior-authorization, and payer rule sets at the conformed silver layer
- Fabric notebooks scoring every claim against the payer rule set with documented model governance and a named human-in-the-loop reviewer queue
- Power Apps reviewer queue routing the high-denial-risk subset to the right specialist with a one-click action handoff
- Microsoft 365 Copilot grounding on the de-identified claim corpus behind a Purview sensitivity label for reviewer triage acceleration
Population health — panels, gaps, and SDOH
Population health spans panel management, care-gap closure, social-determinants-of-health enrichment, and value-based-care contract performance. The Fabric Healthcare lakehouse holds the conformed clinical, enrollment, claims, and SDOH layers. Fabric notebooks build panel views, care-gap lists, and VBC performance attribution. Power BI delivers panel-manager and VBC leadership dashboards. Dynamics 365 runs outreach. Copilot grounds on the de-identified gold-layer panel for leadership Q-and-A.
Microsoft surfaces in scope
- Fabric Healthcare lakehouse — conformed clinical, enrollment, claims, and social-determinants-of-health enrichment at the silver layer
- Fabric notebooks — panel attribution, care-gap closure list generation, and value-based-care performance attribution
- Power BI panel-manager and value-based-care leadership dashboards anchored on the gold layer with row-level security
- Dynamics 365 Patient Engagement outreach for care-gap closure, screening eligibility, and chronic-condition management — consent-gated
EHR Integration Patterns — Epic, Oracle Health, MEDITECH, NextGen
Microsoft Cloud for Healthcare does not replace the electronic health record — it complements it through the Azure Health Data Services FHIR service and the Microsoft Fabric Healthcare lakehouse. The four EHR vendors that dominate the HIPAA-covered enterprise footprint — Epic, Oracle Health (formerly Cerner), MEDITECH, and NextGen Healthcare — each have a named integration pattern with the Microsoft Cloud for Healthcare stack. Deeper coverage of EHR-to-Microsoft integration patterns lives at the Healthcare EHR + Microsoft Integration hub.
Epic
Epic on FHIR endpoints feed Azure Health Data Services FHIR service for sanctioned interoperability. Caboodle mirrors into the Microsoft Fabric Healthcare lakehouse for the analytical layer. Storm grounds Microsoft 365 Copilot inside the Epic perimeter for clinician-facing Copilot scenarios. Microsoft Entra ID single sign-on covers Hyperdrive, the Epic patient portal MyChart federates through Entra External ID where the integrated delivery network owns the patient identity layer.
Oracle Health (Cerner)
Oracle Health FHIR endpoints feed Azure Health Data Services FHIR service. Cerner DataLake and HealtheIntent population-health feeds land in the Microsoft Fabric Healthcare lakehouse. HealtheLife patient-portal exports are classified by Purview before any Microsoft 365 surface ingests them. Microsoft Entra ID covers the clinician identity layer and Entra External ID covers the patient identity layer through HealtheLife federation.
MEDITECH
MEDITECH Expanse Greenfield FHIR endpoints feed Azure Health Data Services FHIR service. The MEDITECH Data Repository extracts into the Fabric Healthcare lakehouse bronze layer with the medallion architecture conforming and de-identifying through silver and gold. Microsoft Teams Healthcare EHR connector surfaces patient context to clinicians inside Teams.
NextGen Healthcare
NextGen Enterprise FHIR APIs feed Azure Health Data Services FHIR service for ambulatory specialty-practice scenarios. NextGen resource extracts conform through the Fabric Healthcare medallion architecture. The patient identity layer federates through Entra External ID where the practice owns the consumer identity surface.
Regulatory Boundary — HIPAA, 42 CFR Part 2, FDA, and State Privacy Law
HIPAA alone is not the boundary in 2026. The Microsoft Cloud for Healthcare deployment plan layers HIPAA, 42 CFR Part 2 substance-use-disorder records, FDA Software as a Medical Device, and state privacy law into one mapped regulatory control plane — applied at the Purview sensitivity-label layer, the Sentinel audit-log layer, and the Dynamics 365 consent layer.
HIPAA Privacy + Security Rules
- Microsoft HIPAA Business Associate Agreement is the foundational document and covers in-scope Microsoft Cloud for Healthcare services as Microsoft defines them — Azure Health Data Services, Fabric, Microsoft 365, Purview, Sentinel, Dynamics 365, Entra ID, and Microsoft 365 Copilot
- EPC Group signs a downstream Business Associate Agreement with the Covered Entity covering EPC consulting and managed services across the Microsoft Cloud for Healthcare stack
- Sub-processor disclosure addendum signed at engagement kick-off and refreshed at every architecture change
42 CFR Part 2 substance-use disorder records
- A separate segregation layer at the Fabric Healthcare silver layer with a separate Purview sensitivity-label family and a separate access-approval workflow
- Dedicated Power BI workspace topology for any 42 CFR Part 2 dataset, with row-level and object-level security at the dataset boundary
- Re-disclosure governed by the 42 CFR Part 2 consent workflow, integrated with the Purview sensitivity-label policy at the source — not retrofitted at the report-publication layer
FDA software-as-a-medical-device + clinical decision support
- Predictive models inside Microsoft Fabric notebooks that drive clinical decisions undergo named model governance — intended use, training data, validation cohort, drift monitoring, and clinical-end-user disclosure
- Where a model meets the Software as a Medical Device threshold, the EPC engagement coordinates with the regulatory affairs team on the FDA submission path before the model crosses into clinical production
- Copilot Studio healthcare agents that surface clinical recommendations carry explicit decision-support disclosures and human-in-the-loop checkpoints
State privacy law — CMIA, HB 300, SHIELD Act, My Health My Data Act
- California Confidentiality of Medical Information Act, Texas HB 300, New York SHIELD Act, and Washington My Health My Data Act mapped to the Purview sensitivity-label taxonomy at engagement kick-off
- State-specific consent and re-disclosure requirements honored in the Dynamics 365 Patient Engagement consent model and in the Power Automate outreach orchestration
- Cross-border data-residency constraints — Canadian PHIPA, EU GDPR Article 9 health data — addressed through Fabric capacity placement and tenant-region pinning
Governance + Sensitivity-Label Grounding for Copilot on PHI
Microsoft 365 Copilot and Copilot Studio healthcare agents are the most-requested AI surfaces in healthcare enterprises today, and they are also the easiest surfaces on which to accidentally leak protected health information. The governance plane is the precondition — Purview sensitivity labels, documented grounding catalogs, agent guardrails, Sentinel audit retention, and a quarterly governance review with documented evidence — applied across every Microsoft Cloud for Healthcare component before the first AI surface reaches general availability. Deeper governance coverage lives at the Microsoft Purview Data Governance hub.
1. Purview sensitivity-label taxonomy for the healthcare boundary
A healthcare-specific Purview taxonomy spans PHI-Identified, PHI-Limited-Dataset, PHI-De-Identified-Safe-Harbor, PHI-De-Identified-Expert-Determination, Substance-Use-Disorder-Part-2, Business-Confidential, and Public. Labels apply at the OneLake storage layer in Fabric Healthcare and propagate automatically to every Power BI dataset, SharePoint library, Dataverse table in Dynamics 365, and Copilot grounding surface. Exception requests are routed through a named approval workflow signed by the responsible Information System Security Officer.
2. Copilot grounding catalog with documented re-identification risk
Copilot is never grounded directly on identified clinical records. The grounding catalog enumerates every SharePoint library, Power BI dataset, Fabric Healthcare gold-layer table, and Dataverse table that Copilot may ground on, with the named sensitivity label and named owner per item. The de-identification approach — Safe Harbor or Expert Determination — is documented with residual re-identification risk and approved by the Information System Security Officer before general availability.
3. Copilot Studio healthcare agent guardrails
Copilot Studio healthcare agents for symptom triage, appointment booking, screening eligibility, and benefit eligibility are scoped through declarative guardrails — allowed topics, disallowed topics, clinical-decision-support disclosure, escalation-to-human triggers, and transcript retention into Sentinel for seven years. The agent runtime honors Dynamics 365 consent and Purview labels at every turn.
4. Sentinel audit trail with seven-year retention
Every audit log across the Microsoft Cloud for Healthcare surface — Azure Health Data Services workspace logs, FHIR and DICOM access logs, MedTech ingestion logs, OneLake access logs, Power BI activity logs, Dynamics 365 audit logs, Teams audit logs, Purview audit logs, and Copilot interaction logs — pipes into Sentinel under immutable storage with a default seven-year retention window and documented legal-hold workflow.
5. Quarterly governance review with documented evidence package
A quarterly governance review covers the sensitivity-label taxonomy, Copilot grounding catalog, agent guardrails, Sentinel detection rule set, and any documented exceptions. The evidence package is signed by the Information System Security Officer, Chief Compliance Officer, and EPC engagement principal — stored in immutable storage, ready for the next CMS Promoting Interoperability survey or Joint Commission accreditation visit.
EPC Healthcare Cloud Accelerator — Five Phases, $300K to $1.2M
The EPC Healthcare Cloud Accelerator is a fixed-scope, fixed-fee, milestone-priced engagement that delivers Microsoft Cloud for Healthcare end-to-end against the named EHR vendor and the named regulatory boundary. Senior-architect-led, no offshore handoff, weekly executive briefing, named regulator evidence package at handoff. Pricing $300K (single-component foundation) to $1.2M (full five-phase deployment) depending on scope.
Phase 1: Discovery and architecture
Weeks 1 to 3
Named EHR vendor, named regulatory overlay, named Microsoft Cloud for Healthcare components in scope, named integration patterns, and named regulatory boundary documented end-to-end. The phase output is the signed integration architecture document and the signed Business Associate Agreement scope addendum.
Named deliverables
- Microsoft Cloud for Healthcare component map — Azure Health Data Services workspace, Fabric Healthcare lakehouse, Dynamics 365 Patient Engagement, Teams Healthcare, Power Platform templates
- Regulatory boundary map — HIPAA scope, 42 CFR Part 2 scope, FDA SaMD scope, state privacy law overlay, cross-border data residency
- BAA scope addendum naming every Microsoft service in scope and every sub-processor in the data flow
Phase 2: Foundation build — Azure Health Data Services + Fabric Healthcare lakehouse
Weeks 4 to 8
Provision the Azure Health Data Services workspace with FHIR, DICOM, and MedTech services. Stand up the Microsoft Fabric Healthcare lakehouse with the bronze, silver, gold medallion architecture and the OMOP Common Data Model conversion. Land the first EHR vendor data through the sanctioned FHIR endpoint and the clinical data warehouse mirror. Apply the Purview sensitivity-label taxonomy at OneLake.
Named deliverables
- Azure Health Data Services workspace live with FHIR service, DICOM service, and MedTech service provisioned and tested
- Fabric Healthcare lakehouse live with bronze, silver, gold layers and OMOP CDM conversion against the first EHR vendor source
- Purview sensitivity-label taxonomy applied at OneLake and propagated to first Power BI dataset
- Microsoft Sentinel pipeline configured for FHIR, DICOM, MedTech, OneLake, and Power BI activity logs with seven-year retention
Phase 3: Engagement layer — Dynamics 365 + Teams Healthcare + Power Platform
Weeks 9 to 14
Stand up Dynamics 365 Patient Engagement on Dataverse with the longitudinal patient record. Configure Microsoft Teams Healthcare with the EHR connector and Virtual Appointments. Deploy the Power Platform healthcare templates appropriate to the engagement — care coordination, patient intake, screening eligibility, revenue cycle. Wire consent and preferences through the stack.
Named deliverables
- Dynamics 365 Patient Engagement live on Dataverse with FHIR resource alignment, care-management workspace, and care-coordinator security model
- Microsoft Teams Healthcare EHR connector live for the named EHR vendor and Virtual Appointments configured for the named clinical service lines
- Power Platform healthcare template deployment across the named scope — care coordination, patient intake, screening eligibility, revenue cycle
- Consent and preferences model wired through Dynamics 365, Power Automate outreach, and Copilot Studio healthcare agents
Phase 4: AI surface — Copilot grounding + Copilot Studio agents + Fabric notebooks
Weeks 15 to 20
Stand up Microsoft 365 Copilot grounding on de-identified gold-layer extracts behind a Purview sensitivity label. Deploy named Copilot Studio healthcare agents for symptom triage, appointment booking, and screening eligibility with named guardrails. Deploy Fabric notebooks for sepsis early warning, unplanned readmission, claims denial avoidance, or panel risk stratification as scoped.
Named deliverables
- Microsoft 365 Copilot grounding catalog signed with named sensitivity label per item, named owner per item, and documented re-identification risk
- Copilot Studio healthcare agents live with named guardrails, named escalation triggers, and named transcript-retention pipeline into Sentinel
- Fabric notebook deployment for the named clinical or financial AI use case with documented model governance and human-in-the-loop reviewer queue
- Copilot interaction-log pipeline into Sentinel live with seven-year retention indexed by user, grounding source, and prompt category
Phase 5: Audit-readiness and operational handoff
Weeks 21 to 24
Audit-readiness package signed for CMS Promoting Interoperability, CMS Conditions of Participation, Joint Commission accreditation, and the named state privacy law overlay. Operational handoff to the EPC managed-services bench or to the client operating model. Hypercare window with named owner and named exit criteria.
Named deliverables
- CMS Promoting Interoperability, CMS Conditions of Participation, and Joint Commission audit-readiness binder signed by the responsible Information System Security Officer
- Quarterly governance-review cadence stood up with documented evidence package and named approvers
- Operational handoff document covering Run, Watch, Change, and Improve cadences across the Microsoft Cloud for Healthcare stack
- Hypercare window with named owner, named exit criteria, and named ticket-routing model into the EPC managed-services bench or client operating model
Named EPC Healthcare Client Portfolio
EPC Group operates as a Business Associate under HIPAA-compliant Business Associate Agreements across a named healthcare portfolio. The references below are stated at the level the client has authorized — engagement-type description without breach of clinical or commercial confidentiality. Past-performance detail beyond this level is shared under mutual NDA on the first 30-minute scope call.
Palmetto Infusion
Active Business Associate Agreement and Microsoft cloud engagement covering revenue-cycle analytics, cash-application acceleration, and Microsoft Cloud for Healthcare adoption across an ambulatory infusion-therapy footprint.
American Registry of Radiologic Technologists (ARRT)
Microsoft platform engagement covering certifying-body operational workloads with HIPAA-aligned governance and EPC-led Microsoft 365 plus Microsoft Cloud for Healthcare adoption.
Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation (OMRF)
Microsoft platform engagement with HIPAA-aligned governance for biomedical research operations — administrative workflows, research-mission analytics surfaces, and Fabric Healthcare lakehouse adoption.
Eisenhower Health
Microsoft platform engagement supporting a regional integrated delivery network with HIPAA-aligned governance across Microsoft 365, Microsoft analytics, and Microsoft Cloud for Healthcare surfaces.
Medavie
Canadian health-services engagement with Business Associate Agreement, HIPAA-aligned governance, and ECIF-funded Microsoft cloud modernization workstreams spanning the Microsoft Cloud for Healthcare stack.
EPC Group is an active Business Associate under HIPAA-compliant Business Associate Agreements with healthcare clients including Palmetto Infusion, the American Registry of Radiologic Technologists (ARRT), the Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation (OMRF), Eisenhower Health, and Medavie (BAA + HIPAA + ECIF-funded).
EPC Credential Stack
11,000+
Microsoft engagements delivered
500+
Microsoft Fabric implementations
1,500+
Power BI enterprise deployments
29 years
Microsoft consulting delivery since 1997
Microsoft Solutions Partner — six designations
Data & AI (Azure), Digital & App Innovation (Azure), Infrastructure (Azure), Modern Work, Security, and Business Applications.
Active healthcare BAAs
Palmetto Infusion, ARRT, OMRF, Eisenhower Health, Medavie — HIPAA-compliant Business Associate Agreements anchoring the regulated healthcare practice.
4× Microsoft Press bestselling author
Errin O'Connor is the original Microsoft Power BI Project Crescent and SharePoint Project Tahoe beta-team member, with four Microsoft Press titles in print.
Compliance coverage
HIPAA, SOC 2, FedRAMP, FINRA, CMMC, GxP — with 42 CFR Part 2, FDA Software as a Medical Device, CMIA, HB 300, SHIELD Act, and My Health My Data Act mapped to the Purview taxonomy at kick-off.
The healthcare practice runs inside the broader The EPC Group Lifecycle — see also the EPC Cloud Orchestrator, Microsoft Fabric Expertise, Enterprise Regulated Analytics on Microsoft, the AI Financial + Clinical Risk Reporting Playbook, and Digital Transformation on Microsoft Enterprise 2026.
Frequently Asked Questions
What exactly is Microsoft Cloud for Healthcare and how is it different from Azure plus Microsoft 365?
Microsoft Cloud for Healthcare is an industry-specific bundling of Azure services, Microsoft 365, Dynamics 365, and Power Platform with healthcare-aware accelerators on top. The differentiating components are Azure Health Data Services (managed FHIR, DICOM, and MedTech), Microsoft Fabric Healthcare data solutions (healthcare-aware OneLake with OMOP CDM conversion), Dynamics 365 Patient Engagement (longitudinal patient record on Dataverse), Microsoft Teams Healthcare (EHR connector and Virtual Appointments), and the Power Platform healthcare template library. The bundle is in scope under the Microsoft HIPAA Business Associate Agreement.
How does Microsoft Cloud for Healthcare relate to your broader HIPAA Microsoft consulting practice?
The broader HIPAA-covered Microsoft consulting practice spans every healthcare engagement EPC delivers — Power BI, Microsoft 365, SharePoint, identity, and security across Epic, Oracle Health, MEDITECH, and NextGen — described at the /healthcare-it-consulting-hipaa-microsoft-2026 hub. This hub is specifically about the industry-cloud bundling — Azure Health Data Services, Fabric Healthcare, Dynamics 365 Patient Engagement, Teams Healthcare, and Power Platform healthcare templates. A typical engagement uses both — the foundational HIPAA practice for the perimeter and the industry components for the use-case-specific surfaces.
Does Azure Health Data Services replace the EHR FHIR endpoint?
No. Azure Health Data Services FHIR service complements the EHR FHIR endpoint — it consumes the EHR FHIR API, integrates other healthcare data sources (lab, claims, MedTech device telemetry), and exposes one consolidated FHIR endpoint to downstream Microsoft surfaces. The Epic, Oracle Health, MEDITECH, or NextGen FHIR endpoint remains the source of truth for clinical narrative inside the EHR perimeter.
Is Microsoft Fabric Healthcare different from a regular Fabric lakehouse?
Yes. Microsoft Fabric Healthcare data solutions extend Fabric OneLake with healthcare-specific accelerators — preconfigured bronze, silver, gold medallion architecture conformed to FHIR resource types and OMOP Common Data Model, prebuilt de-identification routines, and prebuilt notebooks for population health, payer analytics, clinical quality measures, and social determinants of health. A regular Fabric lakehouse would require building these components from scratch.
Does Microsoft 365 Copilot work safely on PHI in this architecture?
Copilot is never grounded directly on identified clinical records. The EPC pattern grounds Copilot on a curated, de-identified gold-layer extract from the Fabric Healthcare lakehouse, with a Purview sensitivity label enforced at the OneLake storage layer, the Power BI dataset layer, the SharePoint library layer, the Dataverse table layer, and the Copilot prompt-context layer. Re-identification risk is documented and signed by the Information System Security Officer before general availability. Copilot interaction logs flow into Microsoft Sentinel with seven-year retention.
How does Dynamics 365 Patient Engagement fit alongside the EHR?
The EHR is the clinical source of truth for diagnoses, problems, medications, allergies, and clinical narrative. Dynamics 365 Patient Engagement is the relationship and outreach layer that complements it. The longitudinal timeline in Dynamics 365 harmonizes the EHR clinical record (via FHIR resources) with the CRM, marketing, consent, and outreach data that belongs in Dataverse. The care coordinator works in Dynamics 365; the clinician works in the EHR; the FHIR feed bridges them.
What does the EPC Healthcare Cloud Accelerator cost and how long does it run?
The EPC Healthcare Cloud Accelerator is a fixed-scope, fixed-fee, milestone-priced engagement scoped at 90, 120, or 180 days depending on the number of Microsoft Cloud for Healthcare components in scope. Pricing ranges from $300,000 (single-component foundation — Azure Health Data Services plus Fabric Healthcare against one EHR source) to $1.2 million (full five-phase deployment across Azure Health Data Services, Fabric Healthcare, Dynamics 365 Patient Engagement, Teams Healthcare, and the Copilot AI layer). Each phase is priced individually so the client controls the spend gate at every boundary.
Is Microsoft Cloud for Healthcare deployable in Canada and the European Union?
Yes — with cross-border data-residency addressed through Fabric capacity placement and tenant-region pinning. Canadian engagements (Ontario PHIPA and comparable provincial statutes) pin the Fabric Healthcare lakehouse and Azure Health Data Services workspace to Canada-resident regions; EU engagements (GDPR Article 9) pin to EU regions. The Microsoft HIPAA BAA does not apply outside the United States, but the equivalent vendor agreements mapped to the local regulatory baseline are signed at kick-off. EPC Group has executed a Canadian engagement with Medavie under a BAA, HIPAA-aligned governance, and ECIF-funded modernization.
Talk to an EPC Healthcare Cloud Architect
A 60-minute call with a senior healthcare Microsoft architect — no sales lead. We will give you an honest scope-fit assessment against the Microsoft Cloud for Healthcare components in scope, the EHR vendor, the regulatory overlay, and the named pricing band for a 90-day, 120-day, or 180-day Healthcare Cloud Accelerator. If a different firm is a better fit, we will say so.
Errin O'Connor · Founder & CEO · Microsoft Solutions Partner · 4× Microsoft Press bestselling author · 4900 Woodway Drive, Suite 830, Houston, TX 77056