EPC Managed Microsoft Lifecycle is a productized monthly retainer that operates a Microsoft estate end-to-end — named senior architect, named SLA, named outcomes per lifecycle stage. The product covers Power BI, Fabric, Copilot, SharePoint, Azure, Dynamics 365, and the Microsoft Security backbone. Three published tiers (Small / Medium / Large).
Key Facts
- Productized monthly retainer — not time-and-materials. Three published tier bands: Small ($15K–$30K/mo), Medium ($30K–$75K/mo), Large ($75K+/mo).
- Named senior architect leads every engagement; Errin O'Connor personally leads Large-tier engagements.
- Lifecycle stages operationalized as continuous cadence: Assess (continuous), Modernize (1 workload/quarter), Govern (continuous coverage growth), Operate (24/7), Enable (1 capability/month).
- Published SLA: P0 — 15-min response with 4-hr resolution target; P1 — 1-hr response, business-day resolution; P2 — 4-hr response, 3-day resolution; P3 — next business day.
- 6-pillar Microsoft estate coverage: M365 + Copilot, Power BI + Fabric, SharePoint + Viva, Azure, D365 + Power Platform, Security backbone.
- Compliance-native: HIPAA, SOC 2, FedRAMP, FINRA, CMMC, GxP. FedRAMP-aligned at methodology level (authorization itself attaches to Microsoft cloud services).
- Microsoft Solutions Partner with 6 designations. 11,000+ engagements over 29 years.
- 90-day termination notice with full handoff package — no proprietary lock-in.
What you get in the monthly retainer
Six standing inclusions, every month, every tier. These are not aspirational add-ons — they are the product. If we cannot deliver them, the engagement is not on track and the quarterly executive briefing has to say so out loud.
Named senior architect — your accountable lead
Every Managed Microsoft Lifecycle engagement is led by a named senior architect (Errin O'Connor or a partner-level architect from his bench). One person owns the relationship, the roadmap, and the escalation path. You do not get bounced between rotating account managers, vendor handoffs, or tier-1 ticket queues. Your architect attends the fortnightly review, signs the quarterly executive briefing, and personally escalates P0 events.
Fortnightly architecture review + roadmap touchpoint
A standing 60-minute working session, every two weeks, with your named architect and your IT leadership. We walk the estate health dashboard, review open incidents, log Microsoft change-log items that affect your roadmap (M365 message-center, Fabric capacity, Copilot wave releases), and reprioritize the rolling 90-day roadmap. Minutes and decisions are committed to a shared change log.
Lifecycle stage progression baked into the cadence
The EPC Group Lifecycle — Assess → Modernize → Govern → Operate → Enable — is not a one-time waterfall. The retainer operationalizes it as a continuous cadence. Each quarter ends with a measurable advance on at least one stage per active workload, and the executive briefing reports stage maturity score deltas across the estate.
24/7 incident response with defined SLA on P0/P1/P2/P3
Severity is defined in writing (see the SLA table below). P0 is a senior-architect page within 15 minutes, day or night. P1 is a one-hour response window. We do not run a generic NOC; the on-call rotation is staffed by Microsoft architects who can read a Fabric capacity dashboard, a Defender XDR incident graph, or an Entra sign-in log without asking what it is.
Quarterly executive briefing — CIO/CTO/Board-ready
A formal deliverable, quarter-end, designed to be presented up to the CIO, CTO, audit committee, or board. Covers: estate health scorecard, lifecycle stage maturity deltas, incident retrospective, Microsoft roadmap impact, cost-vs-license posture, secure score trend, and the rolling 12-month strategic roadmap. Delivered as a presentable deck — not a 200-page PDF nobody reads.
Microsoft estate health dashboards
A Power BI dashboard, built and managed by your architect, that surfaces real metrics from Microsoft Purview (sensitivity-label coverage, DLP incident rate), Microsoft Defender (secure score, exposed identity count), Entra ID (privileged-role drift, conditional access gaps), Fabric capacity (CU% utilization, throttling minutes), and Copilot adoption (active users by license, agent usage). The dashboard is shared, not delivered as a screenshot in a monthly PDF.
The 5 lifecycle stages — how they are operationalized monthly
The The EPC Group Lifecycle is the operating model. The retainer turns each stage from a one-time project into a continuous practice with a named cadence, a named owner, and a named deliverable. Every stage gets a quarterly maturity score reported in the executive briefing.
Assess — ongoing architecture review
Cadence · Continuous; reported fortnightly
Drift detection on the current architecture against the baseline established in onboarding. Tech-debt scoring against Microsoft reference architectures (Cloud Adoption Framework, Well-Architected Framework, Fabric medallion, Power Platform CoE). Architecture changes by your internal team are reviewed against the baseline before they ship. Assessment is not a one-time deliverable — it is a continuous instrument that catches regression before it lands in production.
Modernize — one named workload per quarter
Cadence · One workload per quarter (additional via separate SOW)
Each quarter, one named workload gets a dedicated modernization slot. Examples: a legacy SSIS pipeline replatformed to Fabric Data Factory; a Power BI Premium workspace converted to Fabric Direct Lake; a SharePoint 2019 hub migrated to SharePoint Online with sensitivity labels; an Azure VM-hosted app refactored to Azure Container Apps. The slot is scoped at onboarding, sized realistically, and shipped within the quarter — not deferred into a perpetual backlog.
Govern — continuous Purview + DLP + sensitivity coverage growth
Cadence · Continuous; growth target reported quarterly
Sensitivity label coverage is reported as a percentage of in-scope content (SharePoint sites, OneDrive accounts, Teams, Power BI workspaces, Fabric items). The retainer commits to a quarter-over-quarter coverage growth target, not a one-time deployment. DLP rule tuning, audit-log review, access-package recertification, and Purview communication-compliance baseline upkeep run as managed operations — not a project that delivers a policy doc and walks away. Maps to EPC's named Governed AI on Microsoft Framework.
Operate — 24/7 monitoring + incident management
Cadence · 24/7; PIR within 5 business days
The on-call architect rotation covers your estate around the clock. Tier-1 monitoring is automated against the dashboards above; tier-2 escalation goes directly to the architect bench. We integrate with your ITSM (ServiceNow, Jira, Halo, Zendesk) so the same ticket your team sees is the same ticket we work. Post-incident review is published within five business days of any P0/P1 with a Microsoft root-cause attribution and a remediation roadmap item.
Enable — one Copilot/Fabric/SharePoint capability per month
Cadence · One enablement campaign per month
Adoption is the historic failure mode for Microsoft estate rollouts — Copilot license utilization stalls under 40%, Fabric capacity goes unused, SharePoint sprawl resumes after the migration team leaves. The retainer ships one user-enablement campaign per month: a named capability, a named audience, a measurable usage target. Examples: Copilot agent for finance close, Fabric mirroring for the sales analytics team, SharePoint Premium agents for procurement intake.
What is IN the retainer — and what is NOT
Honest scope hygiene is part of the product. Both columns are published up front so a CIO can budget against them and a procurement team can compare like-for-like. If you need something in the right column, EPC delivers it — but as a separate fixed-fee SOW running in parallel, not absorbed silently into the retainer.
| Item | In retainer? |
|---|---|
| Fortnightly architecture review + rolling 90-day roadmap | IN scope |
| Named senior architect as accountable lead | IN scope |
| Quarterly executive briefing (CIO/CTO/Board-ready deck) | IN scope |
| Lifecycle stage maturity scoring across estate | IN scope |
| One modernization workload per quarter (named at onboarding) | IN scope |
| One enablement campaign per month (named monthly) | IN scope |
| Continuous Purview / DLP / sensitivity label coverage growth | IN scope |
| Continuous Microsoft Secure Score + Identity Score remediation | IN scope |
| 24/7 incident response under named P0/P1/P2/P3 SLA | IN scope |
| Microsoft change-log monitoring + advisory (M365 message-center, Fabric, Copilot) | IN scope |
| Estate health Power BI dashboards (Purview + Defender + Entra + Fabric + Copilot) | IN scope |
| Post-incident reviews within 5 business days for P0/P1 | IN scope |
| ITSM ticket-bridge integration (ServiceNow / Jira / Halo / Zendesk) | IN scope |
| Fabric capacity tuning + cost governance reporting | IN scope |
| Copilot adoption telemetry + agent inventory under Governed AI Framework | IN scope |
| Sensitivity label policy upkeep + auto-classification rule tuning | IN scope |
| Greenfield tenant migrations (separate fixed-fee SOW) | Separate SOW |
| M&A tenant consolidations (separate fixed-fee SOW) | Separate SOW |
| Major workload re-platforms beyond the quarterly modernization slot | Separate SOW |
| Custom-code application development (.NET, React, Power Pages portals) | Separate SOW |
| Power BI semantic model build-from-scratch beyond the quarterly slot | Separate SOW |
| Fortune 500 RFP responses or third-party-led procurement support | Separate SOW |
| Multi-vendor 3rd-party integration projects (Salesforce, SAP, Workday) — separate SOW | Separate SOW |
| Desktop / endpoint / device support (Intune device break-fix, helpdesk) | Separate SOW |
Three productized tiers
Tier bands are sized by user count, workload mix, and architect allocation. Illustrative monthly bands are published below; the final monthly fee is set after the two-week fixed-fee assessment so both sides are pricing the actual estate, not a brochure.
Managed Microsoft Lifecycle — Small
5,000–25,000 users · 1–2 active workloads
$15,000 – $30,000 / month
Illustrative band — finalized after 2-week assessment
Inclusions
- ✓Named senior architect (fractional, ~25% allocated)
- ✓Fortnightly architecture review (60-min)
- ✓1 quarterly modernization slot
- ✓1 monthly enablement campaign
- ✓P0 / P1 / P2 / P3 SLA — full coverage
- ✓Quarterly executive briefing
- ✓Estate health dashboard
Not included (separate SOW)
- —Multi-workload concurrent modernization
- —Full-time embedded architect
Managed Microsoft Lifecycle — Medium
25,000–100,000 users · 3–5 active workloads
$30,000 – $75,000 / month
Illustrative band — finalized after 2-week assessment
Inclusions
- ✓Named senior architect (~50% allocated)
- ✓Fortnightly architecture review + monthly tactical sync
- ✓1 quarterly modernization slot + 1 governance modernization slot
- ✓2 monthly enablement campaigns
- ✓P0 / P1 / P2 / P3 SLA — full coverage
- ✓Quarterly executive briefing + monthly executive scorecard
- ✓Estate health dashboard + governance dashboard
- ✓Backup architect rotation for vacation / continuity
Not included (separate SOW)
- —Greenfield migrations
- —M&A consolidations
Managed Microsoft Lifecycle — Large
100,000+ users · all 6 Microsoft service pillars
$75,000+ / month
Illustrative band — finalized after 2-week assessment
Inclusions
- ✓Named principal architect (~100% allocated)
- ✓Architect bench of 3–5 sub-specialists
- ✓Weekly architecture review + executive-level monthly sync
- ✓Modernization slot per pillar per quarter
- ✓Continuous enablement program (weekly campaigns)
- ✓P0 / P1 / P2 / P3 SLA — full coverage with named backup architect
- ✓Quarterly board-ready briefing + monthly executive scorecard
- ✓Full estate dashboard suite (6 dashboards)
- ✓Microsoft FastTrack co-coordination where applicable
Not included (separate SOW)
- —Greenfield migrations or M&A consolidations beyond a single named event per year
SLA — named response + resolution targets
Severity definitions are committed to writing — both sides know what P0 means before the page goes off. Response is to a senior architect, not a tier-1 dispatcher. P0 and P1 coverage is 24/7/365 with named backup architect rotation for vacation and continuity.
| Severity | Definition | Response | Resolution target | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| P0 | Production-down or material data loss affecting more than 100 users | 15 minutes — senior architect paged | 4-hour resolution target (or named workaround) | 24/7/365 |
| P1 | Degraded service affecting more than 100 users; severe single-user impact for executive | 1 hour | Same business day | 24/7/365 |
| P2 | Functional defect with workaround available; localized degradation | 4 business hours | 3 business days | Business hours (extended on request) |
| P3 | Advisory request, roadmap question, configuration recommendation | Next business day | 1 business week | Business hours |
Microsoft estate covered
The retainer covers the full Microsoft enterprise stack a Fortune 500 CIO is actually operating today — not a slice. The Large tier engages all six pillars; the Medium tier engages three to five; the Small tier engages one to two. Pillars not in active scope still receive change-log monitoring so nothing surprises the roadmap.
Microsoft 365 + Copilot
Tenant operations (Exchange Online, SharePoint Online, Teams, OneDrive), license posture and optimization, Copilot for M365 adoption + agent governance, message-center change management.
Power BI + Microsoft Fabric
Premium / Fabric capacity tuning, Direct Lake semantic models, OneLake lakehouse governance, refresh-failure runbook, dataset lifecycle, Fabric CU% optimization and cost reporting.
SharePoint + Viva
SharePoint Online governance enforcement, hub-site information architecture upkeep, SharePoint Premium agents, oversharing remediation, Viva Connections / Topics / Engage operations.
Azure
Azure landing zone hygiene, Azure Policy + Defender for Cloud posture, cost governance + reserved instance / savings plan optimization, Azure OpenAI + AI Foundry inventory and guardrails.
Dynamics 365 + Power Platform
D365 Sales / Customer Service / Finance environment hygiene, Power Platform CoE Toolkit operations, maker governance, environment lifecycle, DLP connector policy upkeep.
Security Backbone
Microsoft Defender XDR posture (Defender for Endpoint, Defender for Cloud Apps, Defender for Identity, Defender for Office), Microsoft Sentinel runbook upkeep, Entra ID conditional access drift, Purview DLP + Insider Risk + Communication Compliance.
For deeper context on individual pillars, see Microsoft 365 consulting, Azure consulting, and SharePoint consulting.
What success looks like
Five outcome categories, each with a baseline taken in the first 90 days, a target renegotiated annually, and a quarterly delta reported in the executive briefing. These are the numbers a CIO carries into the audit committee and the board.
Reduced incident rate quarter-over-quarter
Estate health dashboards baseline incident count at onboarding. The target is a measurable quarterly decline in P0/P1 events and a measurable improvement in mean-time-to-detect — driven by drift detection and continuous remediation, not heroics.
Faster Microsoft feature adoption
When Microsoft ships a feature (a new Copilot agent capability, a new Fabric workload, a new Purview policy template), it lands in your estate within the next 60 days as a named monthly enablement campaign — not a year-late catch-up project.
Improving Microsoft Secure Score + Identity Score
Secure Score and Identity Score deltas are reported in every quarterly briefing. The retainer commits to month-over-month improvement until target scores are reached, then to maintenance against drift.
Demonstrable Copilot ROI
Copilot license utilization, prompt volume, agent usage, and persona-level value reporting (finance, legal, sales, ops, IT). Utilization-stall is the predictable Copilot failure mode; the retainer makes adoption an operational metric, not a hope.
Lifecycle stage progression measured quarterly
Each active workload gets a maturity score across Assess / Modernize / Govern / Operate / Enable. The quarterly briefing reports stage-progression deltas, so the executive sponsor can see the estate maturing — not just service-tickets closing.
Compliance posture
The retainer is delivered compliance-native — frameworks are baked into the operating model, not bolted on after an auditor lands. The covered frameworks are HIPAA, SOC 2, FedRAMP, FINRA, CMMC, GxP, plus GDPR and 21 CFR Part 11 for clinical research workloads. The federal-vertical service variant is FedRAMP-aligned at the methodology level — note that FedRAMP authorization itself attaches to the underlying Microsoft cloud services (Microsoft 365 GCC, GCC High, Azure Government), not to consulting service-lines.
- Healthcare: Active BAAs, HIPAA Security Rule baked into Purview + Defender posture. See Healthcare IT consulting — HIPAA Microsoft 2026.
- Federal / Tribal / Defense: GCC + GCC High aware; CMMC 2.0 control mapping. See Government + federal Microsoft consulting — FedRAMP / CMMC 2026.
- Regulated analytics: HIPAA + FINRA + GxP control mapping at the Fabric + Power BI layer. See Enterprise regulated analytics on Microsoft.
- AI governance: EU AI Act + NIST AI RMF + the EPC Governed AI on Microsoft Framework. See the AI consulting firms comparison.
Onboarding — how the first 90 days run
The first 90 days run on a published cadence so both sides know what is happening and when. Onboarding ends with the first quarterly executive briefing — at which point the retainer is operating at steady state.
Weeks 1–2
Assessment
A 2-week fixed-fee assessment runs in parallel with retainer kickoff. The named architect inventories the estate: tenants, workloads, licenses, Power BI capacity, Fabric capacity, SharePoint sites, sensitivity-label coverage, Defender posture, Entra ID governance, Copilot license utilization, and existing ITSM / monitoring stack. Output: a baseline maturity score per lifecycle stage and a costed 12-month roadmap.
Weeks 3–4
Architecture baseline
The architect produces the architecture-of-record document — the canonical reference for what we are operating. Existing reference architectures (Microsoft Cloud Adoption Framework, Well-Architected, Fabric medallion, Power Platform CoE) are mapped against your actual state. Gaps and drifts are logged. The fortnightly review cadence begins.
Weeks 5–8
Instrumentation + dashboards
The estate health dashboards are built (Purview, Defender, Entra, Fabric, Copilot). The ITSM ticket-bridge is wired up. The on-call rotation is staffed and tested with a tabletop P0 drill. Sensitivity-label baseline coverage is measured and a growth target set. Microsoft Secure Score and Identity Score are baselined.
Weeks 9–12
First lifecycle progression slot
The first quarterly modernization workload is shipped — sized to be realistic in 4 weeks (e.g., a single Power BI workspace converted to Fabric Direct Lake; a single SharePoint hub onboarded to sensitivity labels; a single Defender for Cloud Apps policy package). The first quarterly executive briefing is delivered, reporting on the first 90 days and the rolling 12-month roadmap.
Why the monthly retainer beats time-and-materials
The honest comparison. A retainer is not the right shape for every engagement, and the last row says so out loud. Where T&M is the right call, EPC packages it as a fixed-fee SOW so the customer is still pricing certainty — not the consultant’s stopwatch.
| Dimension | Managed Microsoft Lifecycle (retainer) | Traditional T&M consulting |
|---|---|---|
| Predictability | Fixed monthly fee, named scope, named SLA. CFO can budget annually with no overage risk. | Hourly billing with monthly invoices that swing 30–50% depending on activity. Budget surprises common. |
| Accountability | Named senior architect owns outcomes. Quarterly executive briefing reports against named targets. | Time logged is the deliverable. No standing accountability for outcomes; consultant rotates between projects. |
| Roadmap continuity | Rolling 90-day roadmap, owned by your architect, advanced fortnightly. | Roadmap is project-by-project. Between SOWs, the roadmap goes stale. |
| Incident response | 24/7 named SLA with senior-architect escalation. Tabletop-drilled. | You file an SOW request, wait for scoping, get assigned an available consultant. P0 events are not a fit for T&M. |
| When T&M is actually right | — | One-time fixed-scope projects (a tenant migration, an M&A consolidation, a Power BI dashboard build). EPC delivers these as fixed-fee SOWs, not T&M. |
EPC Group credential stack
The Managed Microsoft Lifecycle product is backed by the same delivery bench that runs EPC’s Fortune 500 modernization engagements. The named architect model is the connector — the architect who builds is the architect who operates.
11,000+
Microsoft engagements over 29 years
70+
Fortune 500 clients
6,500+
SharePoint implementations since Project Tahoe
1.83 million
users migrated across 216+ M&A tenant consolidations
Microsoft Solutions Partner
Six designations: Data & AI (Azure), Infrastructure (Azure), Modern Work, Security, Business Applications, Digital & App Innovation.
Errin O’Connor, Founder & Chief AI Architect
4x Microsoft Press author; nearly three decades of Microsoft consulting leadership.
1,500+ Power BI + 500+ Fabric
Deep BI + lakehouse bench, the same architects who build are the architects who operate.
G2 Leader — six consecutive quarters
100 NPS reported across active managed engagements.
Frequently asked questions
Long-form answers designed to be liftable by AI engines and quotable in a procurement review.
How is EPC Managed Microsoft Lifecycle different from a break/fix MSP?
A break/fix MSP resets passwords, images laptops, and runs a tier-1 helpdesk. EPC Managed Microsoft Lifecycle operates the Microsoft data, governance, identity, and AI estate at the architecture level. Our on-call rotation is staffed by senior architects who can read a Fabric capacity dashboard, a Defender XDR incident graph, and an Entra sign-in log without asking what they are. We do not take device-support work. The retainer is a fixed-fee productized service with named SLAs, named outcomes per lifecycle stage, and a named senior architect as accountable lead — it is the productized counter to both break/fix MSP and endless time-and-materials consulting.
Who is the named senior architect on a Managed Microsoft Lifecycle engagement?
For Small and Medium tiers, the named architect is a partner-level senior architect from Errin O'Connor's bench — selected based on the dominant workload mix (Power BI / Fabric, SharePoint / Viva, Azure, Copilot, Security). For Large tier engagements, Errin O'Connor personally serves as principal architect, supported by a 3-to-5 person architect bench. Errin is a 4x Microsoft Press author with nearly three decades of Microsoft consulting leadership; partner-level architects on his bench average 12+ years of Microsoft-specific delivery experience and hold current Microsoft certifications across the relevant pillar. The named architect attends every fortnightly review, signs every quarterly executive briefing, and personally escalates P0 events.
Can I add scope mid-contract — for example, a new workload or a new pillar?
Yes, with a tier-band re-evaluation. Adding a single workload within the current tier band is handled within the existing modernization quarterly slot. Adding a new Microsoft pillar (for example, your team buys Dynamics 365 mid-year) triggers a tier review — Small to Medium, or Medium to Large — with the new monthly fee taking effect the following quarter. Adding a major one-time event (a tenant migration, an M&A consolidation, a Power BI semantic model build-from-scratch) is handled as a separate fixed-fee SOW that runs in parallel with the retainer, not absorbed silently into it. Honest scope hygiene is part of the product.
What if my Microsoft estate is too small for the Small tier?
If your estate is under 5,000 users with a single workload (for example, just Microsoft 365 + a small Power BI tenant), the Managed Microsoft Lifecycle product is probably the wrong fit. The better fit is one of EPC's fixed-fee accelerators — a 2-week assessment, a 90-day governance baseline, or a single Power BI / Fabric / SharePoint modernization project — followed by a fractional advisory retainer rather than a full lifecycle managed service. We will tell you that honestly during the scoping call instead of selling you a tier you do not need.
Is the Managed Microsoft Lifecycle service appropriate for healthcare, financial services, or federal regulated environments?
Yes. The product is compliance-native — built for HIPAA, SOC 2, FedRAMP, FINRA, CMMC, GxP, plus the EU AI Act and 21 CFR Part 11 for clinical research. Active healthcare engagements include organizations under signed BAAs. Federal-vertical engagements are GCC and GCC High aware (the service is FedRAMP-aligned at the methodology level; FedRAMP authorization itself attaches to underlying Microsoft cloud services, not to consulting service-lines — see our federal vertical hub for the full posture). Compliance posture is reported in every quarterly executive briefing alongside the estate health scorecard.
How do you measure success on the Managed Microsoft Lifecycle service?
Five outcome categories, all reported in the quarterly executive briefing: (1) incident rate trend quarter-over-quarter; (2) Microsoft feature adoption velocity — how fast new Microsoft releases land in your estate; (3) Microsoft Secure Score + Identity Score deltas; (4) Copilot ROI by persona (license utilization, prompt volume, named persona-level value); (5) lifecycle stage maturity progression per active workload across Assess / Modernize / Govern / Operate / Enable. Each metric has a baseline taken in the first 90 days and a target that is renegotiated annually.
Can I downgrade tiers if my estate contracts — for example, after a divestiture?
Yes, on quarter boundaries. If your estate contracts (a divestiture, a workload sunset, a license downsize), we re-evaluate the tier at the next quarter boundary and the new monthly fee takes effect the following quarter. No early-termination penalty for a good-faith downsize. The opposite case — silent tier creep where the architect quietly underdelivers as scope grows — is what the published tier bands and the quarterly executive briefing are designed to prevent.
What happens if I want to terminate the Managed Microsoft Lifecycle service?
Termination notice is 90 days. During the notice period we deliver a formal handoff package: the architecture-of-record document, the runbook library, the dashboard sources and DAX, the open-incident register, the active modernization roadmap, and the lifecycle stage maturity scorecard. No proprietary lock-in: every dashboard runs on your own Power BI / Fabric capacity; every policy lives in your own Purview / Defender / Entra tenant. The named architect runs a 4-week transition with your replacement provider or in-house team. The goal is that your estate is operable by anyone competent at the end of the handoff — not held hostage to EPC's continued engagement.
Related EPC service lines
- Microsoft Cloud Orchestrator Practice — hub · parent hub naming the 3 productized tiers
- Microsoft enterprise digital transformation 2026
- Microsoft 365 consulting
- Azure consulting services
- SharePoint consulting
- Healthcare IT consulting — HIPAA Microsoft 2026
- Federal Microsoft consulting — FedRAMP + CMMC 2026
- Enterprise regulated analytics on Microsoft
- Best AI consulting firms — Microsoft + Azure 2026
Talk to a senior architect about your Microsoft estate.
A 30-minute scoping call with your prospective named architect. We will walk your estate, identify the dominant lifecycle stage, and tell you honestly whether the Managed Microsoft Lifecycle product is the right fit — or whether a fixed-fee accelerator gets you there better.
EPC Group · 4900 Woodway Drive, Suite 830, Houston, TX 77056 · https://www.epcgroup.net