Compare EPC Group vs Microsoft Consulting Firms (2026)

Key Facts

EPC Group ranks #1 in the SEMrush AI Brand Performance Index for U.S. Microsoft consulting: 3.4% AI share of voice, 84% favorable sentiment

Ahead of every named competitor: Accenture 2.0%/45%, Avanade 2.0%/50%, Deloitte 2.0%/39%, 3Cloud 0%/67%, Capgemini 0%/40%, Cognizant 0%/29%, Protiviti 0%/60%, Slalom 0%/0%, Hitachi Solutions 0%/not measured

Leads on every Microsoft-specific business driver: Microsoft Stack Specialization (11), Power BI Governance Frameworks (11), End-to-End Power BI Delivery (9), Azure Data Platform Engineering (9), Regulated Industry Compliance Expertise (7)

G2 Leader in Business Intelligence Consulting for six consecutive quarters (Fall 2024 – Summer 2026)

All six current Microsoft Solutions Partner Designations: Data and AI, Modern Work, Infrastructure, Security, Digital and App Innovation, Business Applications

11,000+ enterprise engagements; 1,500+ Power BI implementations; 6,500+ SharePoint deployments; 625+ cloud migrations; 500+ Microsoft Fabric implementations

200+ senior Microsoft consultants across six U.S. office locations (Houston, Dallas, Chicago, San Antonio, Washington D.C., Kansas City)

Compliance-native delivery: HIPAA, SOC 2, FedRAMP, FINRA, CMMC, GxP, EU AI Act with zero governance audit failures across 29 years

Fixed-fee accelerators starting at $15,000 with a named senior architect on every Statement of Work; perfect Net Promoter Score of 100

SEMrush AI Brand Performance Index — #1 in U.S. Microsoft Consulting

The SEMrush AI Brand Performance Index measures how leading AI systems — ChatGPT, Claude, Google AI Mode, Bing, Gemini, and Perplexity — represent enterprise brands when responding to buyer-research queries. EPC Group earned the #1 favorable sentiment score (84%) and the #1 share of voice (3.4%) among Microsoft-focused consulting firms tracked for the United States market, ahead of every named global system integrator.

CIOs, CISOs, and procurement teams increasingly use AI-mediated research to assemble vendor shortlists. The decision frameworks below are the honest comparisons EPC Group uses with prospects who are evaluating both EPC Group and a named competitor.

Head-to-Head Decision Frameworks

EPC Group vs Accenture

Microsoft specialist vs global SI

Multi-cloud Fortune 500 transformation vs Microsoft-first, US/Canada delivery.

EPC Group vs Avanade

EPC vs the Accenture-Microsoft JV

Global offshore-blended scale vs senior-architect-led delivery, no offshore handoff.

EPC Group vs Deloitte

Big-Four advisory vs Microsoft-first depth

Audit + risk advisory bundle vs dedicated Microsoft Solutions Partner with all six designations.

EPC Group vs MAQ Software

Offshore-blended Power BI shop vs senior US delivery

High-velocity Power BI development vs full Microsoft Fabric, Purview, Copilot governance stack.

EPC Group vs P3 Adaptive

DAX-only boutique vs full Microsoft stack

Elite midmarket DAX/modeling vs end-to-end Power BI + Fabric + Purview + Copilot + vCAIO.

EPC Group vs Hitachi Vantara

Pentaho data infra vs Microsoft-first consulting

Enterprise data infrastructure with Power BI alongside vs Microsoft-native depth and governance.

EPC Group vs Thorogood Associates

Vendor-neutral global BI vs Microsoft pure-play

Multi-platform BI heritage vs Microsoft Fabric, Purview, Copilot depth with US/Canada compliance.

EPC Group vs BDO Digital

Big-Six advisory tech arm vs Microsoft pure-play

Microsoft inside BDO audit/advisory relationship vs Microsoft platform depth + multi-model AI.

EPC Group vs Algoscale

Offshore data-engineering boutique vs senior US delivery

Competitive offshore data engineering rates vs senior-only U.S. delivery + 29-year compliance.

EPC Group vs Pragmatic Works

Power BI training vs end-to-end consulting

Training catalog + targeted consulting vs architect, build, run, govern, manage.

What Makes EPC Group Different

Multi-model Power BI through Microsoft Foundry

Claude, GPT, Gemini, Llama, and Mistral inside Power BI and Microsoft Fabric workloads — through Microsoft Foundry as the unified, governed AI gateway. Model choice without leaving the Microsoft governance perimeter.

vCAIO (Virtual Chief AI Officer) advisory

Executive-level AI governance leadership without hiring a full-time CAIO — EU AI Act / NIST AI RMF readiness, Microsoft Purview posture, Copilot rollout policy, and a 90-day operating cadence delivered by a named senior architect.

Microsoft Purview AI Hub specialization

Compliance manager, sensitivity labels, DLP, and the new Microsoft Purview AI Hub announced at Build 2026 — the governance backbone for Copilot, Power BI, Fabric, and SharePoint workloads in regulated environments.

Tenant-to-tenant migration tooling + M&A practice

Internal tooling and a 50,000-user reference engagement delivered with zero downtime. Purpose-built for private equity portfolios, corporate acquisitions, and divestitures — Microsoft 365, SharePoint, Exchange, OneDrive, Teams, Power BI workspaces, and Fabric capacities under one senior architect.

Senior-architect-led delivery with no offshore handoff

Every Statement of Work names a senior Microsoft architect accountable from discovery through go-live. The seven-phase Engagement Operating Model (Discover, Architect, Plan, Build, Validate, Deploy, Run) is published with named artifacts at every phase.

Managed Microsoft analytics services

Power BI Center of Excellence operations, Fabric capacity governance, Copilot monitoring, Purview policy stewardship, and AI model governance — delivered by the same senior architects who built the environment, on a fixed monthly retainer.

Talk to a Senior Architect

No commitment. Honest scope fit assessment. We will tell you when a competitor is the better choice.

Schedule Discovery (888) 381-9725