Superior Court of California, County of Amador — Exchange 2019 and Active Directory Migration (2024): Evidence Record
Claim level: Contracted
Verified against the 1 primary source document and 1 redacted page image published on this page. Every published file carries a SHA-256.
On May 30, 2024 the Superior Court of California, County of Amador issued Purchase Order 4500147661 to O'Connor Enterprise Group Inc., doing business as EPC Group, for an initiative migrating Microsoft Exchange 2013 to Exchange 2019, resolving AD Connect issues, and migrating the domain controller from Windows Server 2012 to 2019 — the first of two engagements with the same court.
Engagement fact, as the document states it
Purchase Order 4500147661 (May 30, 2024): "Initiative for Migration from Microsoft Server Exchange 2013 to Microsoft Exchange 2019 Server, Resolution of AD Connect Issues, and Migration of the domain controller from 2012 to 2019."
- Exchange 2013 to Exchange 2019 migration; resolution of AD Connect issues; domain controller migration from Windows Server 2012 to 2019 (client document)
Period on the paper: 2024-05 (no end date is stated on the published documents).
O'Connor Enterprise Group, Inc., doing business as EPC Group, is the legal contracting entity for the engagements documented here.
Verification summary
| Verification vector | Validated value |
|---|---|
| Client entity | Superior Court of California, County of Amador |
| EPC contracting entity | O'Connor Enterprise Group Inc, Houston — as printed |
| Document type | Purchase order with the court's terms and conditions (rev. Aug. 2022) |
| Date | May 30, 2024 |
| Technology | Microsoft Exchange 2013 → 2019; Azure AD Connect; Windows Server 2012 → 2019 domain controller |
| Scope shown in source | The item text quoted above, as printed |
Source documents
Purchase Order 4500147661 — Superior Court of California, County of Amador
- Document type:
- Purchase order
- Date:
- May 30, 2024
- Issuer:
- Superior Court of California, County of Amador
- Published:
- Page 1 of 2, redacted (the court's purchase-order terms on page 2 are not reproduced)
What this document establishes
- A California trial court issued a purchase order to O'Connor Enterprise Group Inc. on May 30, 2024 for an Exchange 2013 to 2019 migration, AD Connect remediation and a domain-controller migration.
What it does not establish
- That the ordered services were performed, completed or accepted.
- Any hours actually consumed, any invoice paid, or any business outcome.
Redactions applied
- Requester and recipient names
- Vendor number and court telephone number
- Every amount
No client name, EPC Group identity, project description or date has been altered.
What this page does not claim
- Delivered: no delivery record or work product is published on this page, so it does not claim the ordered work was performed.
- Accepted: no signed acceptance form or closeout letter is published, so it does not claim the client accepted deliverables.
- Outcome-verified: no client-issued measurement is published, so it does not claim any business result.
- Client-endorsed: no permissioned client statement is published, so nothing here is an endorsement.
Document provenance
Source: EPC Group historical corporate records.
Public version: privacy-redacted reproduction of the pages listed above.
Material alterations: none, other than the redactions disclosed against each document.
Original retained: yes, by EPC Group.
Redaction method: Each published excerpt is rebuilt from a rasterised image of the page, with redaction boxes burned into the pixels before the file is reassembled. The derivative carries no text layer, no annotations, no form fields and no metadata, so nothing beneath a redaction box can be recovered by text extraction. Every derivative was additionally reviewed by eye at high magnification.
What a hash proves: The SHA-256 confirms the downloaded file matches the published file; it does not independently authenticate the underlying agreement.
Basis for publication: public record of a public body. California judicial branch purchase order (public body).
Text transcripts: 01 — generated by optical character recognition from the published, redacted images, never from the originals; where an image is boxed the transcript reads [REDACTED].
Review cycle: this record is reviewed every 90 days.
Questions about this record
Is this the same court as the 2026 record?
Yes. The court issued a second purchase order in February 2026 for the move from Exchange 2019 to Exchange Online; that engagement has its own record with payment advices.
What does this purchase order not show?
Performance, completion, acceptance or outcome. It shows what the court ordered and from whom.
Related evidence records
- Amador County Superior Court — Contracted — payment-corroborated
- Office of the Texas State Chemist — Contracted — countersigned
Service pages this record supports
Client names, trademarks and documents are displayed for factual verification of historical business relationships only. Their inclusion does not imply a current commercial relationship, sponsorship or endorsement.
Last updated by Errin O'Connor, Founder & Chief AI Architect, EPC Group