PepsiCo — MyPepsiCo SharePoint Branding Engagement: Evidence Record
Claim level: EPC-executed instrument + work product
Verified against the 1 source document on this page. Every document carries a published SHA-256.
EPC Group prepared and executed Statement of Work EPC-50490, a custom master page initiative for PepsiCo, Inc., and produced MyPepsiCo intranet design work in 2009. The copy of the statement of work held by EPC Group carries EPC Group’s signature only; no countersigned copy is published.
O'Connor Enterprise Group, Inc., doing business as EPC Group, is the legal contracting entity for the engagements documented here.This page is deliberately marked below Contracted. The instrument published here is executed by EPC Group and is not countersigned in the copy held. That is stated rather than implied, because the claim level on every page follows the documents published on it.
Verification summary
| Verification vector | Validated value |
|---|---|
| Client entity | PepsiCo, Inc. |
| EPC contracting entity | O'Connor Enterprise Group, Inc. d/b/a EPC Group |
| Document type | Statement of Work EPC-50490, executed by EPC Group; and design work product |
| Date | Statement of Work executed by EPC Group June 7, 2009 |
| Technology | Microsoft Office SharePoint Server 2007 — custom master page |
| Client countersignature | Not present in the copy held |
| Evidence ID | EPC-EV-PEP-2009-001 |
Source documents
Statement of Work EPC-50490 — Custom Master Page Initiative
- Document type:
- Statement of Work, executed by EPC Group
- Date:
- Executed by EPC Group June 7, 2009
- Issuer:
- EPC Group, for PepsiCo, Inc.
- Published:
- Cover, statement-of-work and signature pages of 14
SHA-256 of the published file: 0e646c575e70e58af34f75acae21a56e82512aab7ec61299de3eaab5e40f4ffe
What this document establishes
- A statement of work numbered EPC-50490 was prepared for PepsiCo, Inc. covering a custom master page initiative.
- EPC Group executed the instrument on June 7, 2009.
What it does not establish
- It does not establish that PepsiCo countersigned. The client signature block is blank in the copy held.
- It does not establish that the work was performed, delivered or accepted.
Redactions applied
- EPC signature
- The cost and timeline page is not published
- The appendix naming other client organisations is not published
No client name, EPC Group identity, project description or date has been altered.
What this page does not claim
- This page does not claim that PepsiCo countersigned the statement of work. The client signature block is blank in the copy held by EPC Group.
- This page does not claim deployment, delivery, acceptance or any measured outcome.
- This page does not publish or characterise the commercial terms of the statement of work.
- This page does not claim a current commercial relationship, sponsorship or endorsement.
Document provenance
Source: EPC Group historical corporate records.
Public version: privacy-redacted reproduction of the pages listed above.
Material alterations: none, other than the redactions disclosed against each document.
Original retained: yes, by EPC Group.
Redaction method: Each published excerpt is rebuilt from a rasterised image of the page, with redaction boxes burned into the pixels before the file is reassembled. The derivative carries no text layer, no annotations, no form fields and no metadata, so nothing beneath a redaction box can be recovered by text extraction. Every derivative was additionally reviewed by eye at high magnification.
Review cycle: this record is reviewed every 90 days.
Questions about this record
Is EPC Group’s PepsiCo engagement verified?
Partly, and the page says exactly how far. A statement of work numbered EPC-50490 for a PepsiCo custom master page initiative is published, executed by EPC Group on June 7, 2009. The copy held carries no client countersignature, so this page is not marked Contracted.
Why publish an instrument that is not countersigned?
Because the alternative is to describe the engagement with no document at all. Publishing the instrument and stating plainly what it does not establish is more useful to a reader assessing the record than an unsupported assertion would be.
What would change this page’s claim level?
A countersigned copy of the statement of work, a PepsiCo purchase order, or any remittance or payment record would raise this page to Contracted. The page is built so that adding such a document changes the level.
Client names, trademarks and documents are displayed for factual verification of historical business relationships only. Their inclusion does not imply a current commercial relationship, sponsorship or endorsement.
Last updated by Errin O'Connor, Founder & Chief AI Architect, EPC Group